- 1. Timing Mark Question (score: 1)
- Author: "S. Allen" <sallen3663@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:08:28 -0400
- Quick question that I can't seem to get a straight answer to... I have a 74 1/2 BGT. What mark on the engine should be used to time it with the mark on the pulley and at what rpm? My current instuct
- /html/mgs/2004-10/msg00325.html (6,911 bytes)
- 2. Re: Timing Mark Question (score: 1)
- Author: Bill McLeod <wbmcleod@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:39:06 -0700
- Have you checked to see if the damper has moved internally (i.e. the rubber ring has broken)? I would set the engine up at top dead center and see where the pointer points.... I believe that the timi
- /html/mgs/2004-10/msg00326.html (7,543 bytes)
- 3. Re: Timing Mark Question (score: 1)
- Author: James Harwood <james.harwood@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
- I would concur with that Bill. 11 o'clock viewed from the front seems about right regardless of AM or PM. Nearest the 12 o'clock is TDC, then each notch going anti-clockwise is 5 deg before TDC. If y
- /html/mgs/2004-10/msg00328.html (8,590 bytes)
- 4. Re: Timing Mark Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:55:19 +0100
- A 74 1/2 should have a manifold source for the distributor vacuum in which case you *must* disconnect and plug the pipe from the manifold or you will end up with very retarded timing. When reconnecti
- /html/mgs/2004-10/msg00339.html (7,992 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu