Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Timing\s+advance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Timing\s+advance\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Timing advance (score: 1): Author: "Marge and/or Dave Thomssen" <mdthom@radiks.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 19:45:27 -0500; On spark advance from an old-timer. Correct spark advance is a matter of experience and experimenting. Every engine set up differently will need different advance. Some setups are so similar that the; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00392.html (8,014 bytes)
2. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 07:51:30 -0400; I am very sure that the amount of ignition advance you run tells you a very important thing about your engine, well two actually. The first and most important thing that I have learned is that there; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00398.html (11,393 bytes)
3. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 08:58:52 -0500; Interesting story Dave.... Lets look at My Engine which you have some degree of familiarity with.... We were running 38 degrees and building Big EGT's and adding Tons of Heat.... Would we have cooled; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00400.html (13,127 bytes)
4. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 09:32:39 -0700; Excellent dissertation on timing. However, it seems that there is disagreement as to when the burn needs to be completed, I had read 23 degrees ATDC, in an other publication 20 degrees ATDC, now you; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00402.html (13,857 bytes)
5. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 11:19:32 -0600; ""I found my problem when I got home"", Tom, can or do you desire to share, I am most interested, if you would rather not lt us in, understood, I will share some "learning experiences" as well, not a; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00403.html (14,906 bytes)
6. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 10:17:58 -0700; I had published it already on the list, but here goes again...The last run we made on Thursday we advance the timing 1 more degree, (our fastest run, 222+ MPH, was with 49 degrees BTDC). We also lea; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00405.html (16,902 bytes)
7. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 13:56:46 -0400; that really explains a lot.. you had no cylinder pressure.. no wonder it wanted so much timing! I am also willing to bet that most times anything that wanted as much timing as you ran has serious mec; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00406.html (18,205 bytes)
8. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 14:02:38 -0400; I was referring to peak pressure as opposed to the burn being done. two different #'s. And yes advancing slowly until peak power is the best bet. On the dyno I usually start with something that sound; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00407.html (15,414 bytes)
9. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 13:05:52 -0600; Tom, so bare with me here as many of us bike guys have DOHC, we degree cams in lobe centerlines, do you not set the cam timing using lobe centerlines? It sounds like you use actual degree numbers of; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00409.html (18,300 bytes)
10. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 13:53:01 -0500; Joe when I checked my actual Valve to Piston I did it Ten Before and ten after... Just to make sure I was Okay to alter the Degrees on the Cam if nessesary.... I did this AFTER we ran it on a Dyno...; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00411.html (20,263 bytes)
11. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: ardunbill@webtv.net; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 16:10:32 -0400 (EDT); "Burn Time." I respectfully defer to all the pros and real experts on this List, but don't we want our pressure rise on the piston to jump up and start pushing down hard on it about 15 degrees ATDC (; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00413.html (8,256 bytes)
12. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: Crpt666Kpr@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 18:30:39 EDT; I bet it depends on rod/stroke ratio. Maybe RPM, too. Sean; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00416.html (7,824 bytes)
13. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 15:36:55 -0700; In the past, before I tried to get technical, I just set the cam by the marks and checked it against split overlap. I check piston to valve clearance with modeling clay. Put the clay on the piston u; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00417.html (19,891 bytes)
14. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: Tim Schoeny <tschoen@fuse.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 09:49:27 -0400; What kind of EGT's are you looking for in trying to determine optimal timing or you using other criteria?The Honda seems to like about 32-34 degrees total advance above 6000 RPM and so far we haven't; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00422.html (16,253 bytes)
15. Re: Timing advance (score: 1): Author: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 12:57:51 -0400; I suspect the chambers are virtually identical.. The Cosworth does get a little timing hungry above 9800 though made some improvements running 38 degrees there but was pretty dicey. I save that setup; /html/land-speed/2000-08/msg00433.html (17,923 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]