- 1. Re: Timing the 1275 ? (score: 1)
- Author: Bryan Vandiver <Bryan.Vandiver@Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
- Thanks... You are absolutely right. The crank timing should not change. I didn't really 'think' when I sent my first message. When I had the head off, that's when I checked for TDC, and noticed that
- /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00033.html (11,033 bytes)
- 2. Re: Timing the 1275 ? (score: 1)
- Author: "David Ramsey" <dwramsey@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 99 18:04:45 PDT
- Bryan, Yes, with the ignitor, dwell is not a problem as it should remain constant, which means the timing should also. David Alton at APT claims that for a street engine the vacuum advance distributo
- /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00040.html (13,157 bytes)
- 3. Re: Timing the 1275 ? (score: 1)
- Author: "David Riker" <davidr@sunset.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 20:04:00 -0700
- This is kinda tough to explain, but I'll try. I have a 40DCOE Weber, and I used a very small drill bit to make a hole just to the aircleaner side of the throttle plate. I then used liquid solder to g
- /html/spridgets/1999-08/msg00041.html (11,747 bytes)
- 4. Timing the 1275 ? (score: 1)
- Author: chuck <chuckc@ibm.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:15:32 -0700
- Got the beast running pretty well now, after the "we never laid a glove on it" inspection. But I'm still not real happy with the timing. First I always take out the expensive timing light and try to
- /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg01444.html (7,370 bytes)
- 5. Re: Timing the 1275 ? (score: 1)
- Author: Bryan Vandiver <Bryan.Vandiver@Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
- I have the same question... I'm got a 1275 with a Kent MD266 cam, and dellorto side draft, and ignitor ignition. I 'timed in the cam' to the exact specifications that came with the cam, using a dial
- /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg01450.html (8,528 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu