Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tire\s+Rolling\s+Radius\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tire\s+Rolling\s+Radius\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Tire Rolling Radius (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:55:14 -0800; With the talk about speedo calibration, I thought I'd dig up some of the "rolling diameter" given by tire companies. Now, these assume the wheel width is appropriate for the tire aspect ratio ( 98,; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00454.html (9,124 bytes)
2. Re: Tire Rolling Radius (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:24:26 -0800; I think somehow you got the first formula mixed up a little; The differential ratio, which you indicate here by "(revmotor/revaxle)" should only be in the denominator. You don't make this same mista; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00456.html (10,672 bytes)
3. Re: Tire Rolling Radius (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:37:37 -0800; Steve, et Listers, Adding confusion upon confusion. Sorry, what I meant was the differential ratio should NOT appear in the denominator. I need a second latte. 8>( Bob Robert L. Palmer Dept. of AMES,; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00457.html (7,841 bytes)
4. Re: Tire Rolling Radius (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:01:44 -0800; Bob is correct. That's what happens when you 'cut and past' wrong. Thanks Bob. On the rear axle ratio question, though, you are assuming a non overdrive transmission and in top gear (1:1) This formul; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00465.html (8,692 bytes)
5. Re: Tire Rolling Radius (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:14:59 EST; Because of unknown rear end ratios, tire growth at speed, compounded errors in measuring, or wide allowable tolerances in tire manufactures data, the most direct way of determining the proper number; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00477.html (8,076 bytes)
6. Re: Tire Rolling Radius (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:14:50 -0800; This is a slick way to calibrate your speedo/odo, but I think it needs a bit of clarification. In the first iteration, it makes no difference how fast you drive the ten miles; just note the odo read; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00478.html (9,703 bytes)
7. Re: Tire Rolling Radius (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:56:59 EST; Hi Robert, The reason I drive 60 MPH during the speedometer test is to correct for any tire growth. That probably only matters with bias ply tires, but there are still a few of them around. John Loga; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00481.html (7,058 bytes)
8. Re: Tire Rolling Radius (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 11:42:30 -0800; Makes sense now John; also corrects for tire slip, which occurs for any type of tire. But who really normally drives 60 MPH?? ;>) Bob Robert L. Palmer Dept. of AMES, Univ. of Calif., San Diego rpalm; /html/tigers/1999-03/msg00488.html (7,471 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]