Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tire\s+width\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tire\s+width\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Tire width (score: 1): Author: Scott Fisher <sefisher@cisco.com>; Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 17:12:24 -0700; Andy Webster's question about alloy wheels led to tire width, which reminded me of something. My first LBC ('74 GAN5) came with the stock tires -- Michelin XZX, in something like 145R-13, on Rostyles; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00336.html (9,584 bytes)
2. re: Tire width (score: 1): Author: CONAN@RALVM8.VNET.IBM.COM; Date: Fri, 7 May 99 22:42:51 EDT; Friend of mine has this same good/bad problem with his Miata. Had great fun slipping it around corners when stock. Now he's put shorter, stiffer springs and wide, sticky tires on it. Corners much fa; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00346.html (7,993 bytes)
3. Re: Tire width (score: 1): Author: "Angela Hervey-Tennyson & Peter Westcott" <toobmany@bigpond.com>; Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 19:11:20 +1000; FOr me the best compromise on the road/ track 948 MkII is the 165/70 Falken FKO7U on Rostyles. The Falkens are very progressive and are terrific in the wet. On the standard Bugeye I run the 145/80 Mi; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00370.html (10,242 bytes)
4. Re: Tire width (score: 1): Author: Lancer7676@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 06:57:36 EDT; << 165/70 Falken FKO7U on Rostyles. >> Is 165/70 a standard size--the same size no matter which BRAND of tire you get? Or is it like shoe sizes, with each company deciding for itself what constitutes; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00372.html (7,713 bytes)
5. Re: Tire width (score: 1): Author: "Angela Hervey-Tennyson & Peter Westcott" <toobmany@bigpond.com>; Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 22:11:53 +1000; Tyre sizes are standardised but you can have variances according to tread pattern, sidewall plies, 'rubber' compounds etc although on a standard car it shouldn't make that much difference. Tyre press; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00373.html (8,340 bytes)
6. Re: Tire width (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 08:59:32 EDT; << Is 165/70 a standard size--the same size no matter which BRAND of tire you get? Or is it like shoe sizes, with each company deciding for itself what constitutes a size 9, size 11, or size 13? If I; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00374.html (8,493 bytes)
7. Re: Tire width (score: 1): Author: David Christman <dpc@ai.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 12:39:06 -0400 (EDT); Different tires of the same size will have different shapes. Basicly the sidewall can be flater or rounder, stiffer or softer. If the fit is tight, one tire brand may rub, and one may not.; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00384.html (7,898 bytes)
8. Fw: Tire width (score: 1): Author: "Ric Bergstrom" <Ric_Bergstrom@britishcarclub.com>; Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 19:55:49 -0400; Richard Bergstrom, President Central Virginia British Car Club Richmond VA We welcome all British Cars in the Central Virginia Area E-mail me for details! --Original Message-- From: Ric Bergstrom <Ri; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00412.html (9,616 bytes)
9. Re: Tire width (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 11:53:01 +1000; The short answer is no. There is a range of actual sizes that a given manufacturer can call a nominal size. I can quote one example where a 185/60 is the same as a nominal 175/60 and a 175/60 that is; /html/spridgets/1999-05/msg00569.html (8,492 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]