Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Too\s+Many\s+Messages\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Too\s+Many\s+Messages\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Too Many Messages? (score: 1): Author: "Daryl and Jennifer May" <mayfam@sprynet.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:13:22 -0700; I counted 104 messages in the last 24 hours. Much as I like most of the content, I sense the trend is up, and that too much of a good think isn't as good as less. Could we start a discussion on what; /html/spridgets/1998-09/msg00886.html (8,280 bytes)
2. Re: Too Many Messages? (score: 1): Author: Scott & Glenda Meyers <autox@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:36:20 -0700; A valid point. E-mail is VERY worthwhile, along with the intended purpose of this list. Please do send any personal messages DIRECTLY to the recipient please (congratulations Grandpa/Little League/et; /html/spridgets/1998-09/msg00893.html (9,630 bytes)
3. Re: Too Many Messages? (score: 1): Author: "William M. Gilroy" <wmgilroy@lucent.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:47:11 -0400; Daryl, I am sending this to the entire list because other people may feel that this is a problem. The techno weenie in me speaks. One solution to this type of problem (if you consider it a problem) i; /html/spridgets/1998-09/msg00902.html (10,563 bytes)
4. RE: Too Many Messages? (score: 1): Author: Andrew Griffith <Andrew.Griffith@ReadRite.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 08:06:40 -0700; I agree ! I counted 104 messages in the last 24 hours. Much as I like most of the content, I sense the trend is up, and that too much of a good think isn't as good as less. Could we start a discussio; /html/spridgets/1998-09/msg00905.html (9,029 bytes)
5. Re: Too Many Messages? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Kaplan" <rkaplan@us.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:03:30 -0400; Daryl: I Agree with you. I have been on the verge of un-subscribing to the list for the deluge of messages. Rather than limit the content, I would propose converting the list into a usenet group("rec; /html/spridgets/1998-09/msg00931.html (9,354 bytes)
6. Re: Too Many Messages? (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 01:36:31 -0400; Plus, you get to MAKE MONEY FAST! In all seriousness, moving to a newsgroup blocks out most of the subscribers. Even those with news access often don't get all the groups they want, or the groups app; /html/spridgets/1998-09/msg00937.html (9,816 bytes)
7. Re: Too Many Messages? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Zuchowski" <tzuchow@ibm.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 18:51:32 -0400; Speaking for myself, I would greatly regret seeing the list be converted to a newsgroup. I have never seen a newsgroup reach better than about 25% on-topic content, and they tend to be taken over by; /html/spridgets/1998-09/msg01025.html (10,837 bytes)
8. Re: Too Many Messages? (score: 1): Author: "Nevard, Chris" <Chris.Nevard@BSKYB.COM>; Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:35:00 +0100; This thread has doubled the number of messages in the last few day;-) Oops Chris Liking the list just the way it is! -- From: Tom Zuchowski To: Rick Kaplan; Daryl and Jennifer May; spridgets@autox.te; /html/spridgets/1998-09/msg01038.html (10,872 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]