Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Too\s+much\s+traffic\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Too\s+much\s+traffic\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Too much traffic (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 10:16:22 -0400; I seem to be getting huge amounts of email, most of which is not really wanted. I subscribe to four lists and I am getting over 150 emails a day and this after cancelling one list due to the ridicul; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00590.html (8,331 bytes)
2. Re: Too much traffic (score: 1): Author: "Donald Markham" <donaldmarkham@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 19:11:35 -0500; You might try the method that I use, which I think is the simplest, I just delete any message that I do not want to read and I can scan through the 75-100 messages a day in less than 5 minutes.; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00591.html (7,510 bytes)
3. Re: Too much traffic (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 18:56:53 -0600; I've managed to stay current on this list for much of this year and the traffic is somewhat high. It seemed like it was a lot worse a few years ago so I ended up unsubscribing at the time. About six; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00592.html (7,911 bytes)
4. Re: Too much traffic (score: 1): Author: yd3@nvc.net; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 21:49:48 -0700; Most of your points are well taken. I especially concur on the not so clear subject headings. I also proposed that subject headings should include the vehicle that is the basis of the topic. I don't; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00595.html (7,425 bytes)
5. Re: Too much traffic (score: 1): Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 22:47:12 -0400; I agree with #2, but IMHO with #2 in use the digest actually becomes a pain. ...at list in direct mode, all the MG stuff filters together, and can be sorted by subject. Then at least if you start to; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00596.html (7,594 bytes)
6. Re: Too much traffic (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 23:05:21 -0700; I would also comment that most messages are generally on-topic. The signal-to-noise ratio of this list is pretty high (which is good). There's the rare political discussion which you can ignore, and; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00598.html (7,430 bytes)
7. Re: Too much traffic (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 22:59:32 -0700; One person complains about thank you's, another person recently complained about no thank you's. (sigh) This is a high-traffic list. One of the three highest I subscribe to. Best solution is to get a; /html/mgs/2000-08/msg00603.html (7,227 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]