Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Traction\s+Control\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Traction\s+Control\s*$/: 242 ]

Total 242 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 11:54:27 -0800; Sounds like a cheap way to get more runs out of M/T tires which are not the last I heard. Before M/T tires became available again in the late '80's, there was a lot of money spent on substitutes that; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00104.html (8,573 bytes)
22. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:48:34 -0500; With the current rules how do you plan on proving it does not control anything else? There are no tests that can not be easily defeated. I hope no one thinks jacking the car up and running the engine; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00106.html (10,684 bytes)
23. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 14:57:45 -0500; I remember it very well but that does not guarantee everyone else will ..; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00108.html (8,675 bytes)
24. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "bennevl" <bennevl@netzero.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 19:38:26 -0500; Ok well here is one I stumbled upon, kind of CYA from these people. And their claims of never producing a traction control HA-HA ask them why their programmable timing computers are illegal. http://w; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00111.html (10,359 bytes)
25. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "bennevl" <bennevl@netzero.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:47:30 -0500; Object of my message was meant to say some things might become mandatory just to prevent the use of traction control. Now you have ADDED cost NOT to use traction control. Bill; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00112.html (9,293 bytes)
26. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 06:37:49 -0500; Added cost is what we are all trying to avoid. to And; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00114.html (9,722 bytes)
27. RE: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:12:16 -0600; There used to be something similar used to synchronize aircraft engines. A little wheel rotated when the engines were out of sync and stood still when they were. I doubt if watching that instrument; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00117.html (9,736 bytes)
28. RE: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:43:39 -0500; Please speak for yourself on that point. There is no such thing as cheap racing as no matter what the price you set it will be too much for someone. Some time you save money by spending it on the rig; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00118.html (9,615 bytes)
29. RE: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:05:57 -0600; I had not seen this before. This rules that MSD system out as far as I'm concerned. I don't want any ignition system looking at a waveform and deciding that "it has been modified" and switching to a; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00119.html (9,245 bytes)
30. RE: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "rgribble" <gribbler@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:48:18 -0500; Yes Bill, MSD has a (TC?) product that allows you to program a max RPM per second. Their new 7531 box I think is the number. IMHO it's just an inexpensive safety product that should be allowed in any; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00126.html (9,189 bytes)
31. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 20:29:51 -0800; It sure won't keep you from destroying your irreplaceable M/T tires, if you use them. A system that controls by monitoring driven and non driven wheel speed would save them. It's beginning to look li; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00128.html (8,828 bytes)
32. RE: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:29:22 -0500; I guess I misunderstood your original post as it did not quote what you were replying to.. I don't want that thing on any car I work on as well and the cost is not the reason. It is just something el; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00130.html (10,155 bytes)
33. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 05:49:07 -0600; Being the semi good boy that I am... I have stayed out of this one... and won't have anything to do with Rotary's... It just seems silly to me that the only venue that encourages creative thinking ha; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00132.html (9,319 bytes)
34. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Glenn Ridlen" <glennr7@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:18:29 -0600; I assume this is a rule has been on the books for a long time. Maybe at the time it was written the readily available and relitively cheap technoligy that we have now was not availably. Maybe back th; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00134.html (9,950 bytes)
35. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:04:02 -0600; Tom I suspect your exactly right about using the right channels... I've honestly enjoyed the banter on the subject and have learned a bit as we go along... Dave is a wonderful teacher off line as wel; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00136.html (9,748 bytes)
36. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:25:51 -0800; Keith,Tom & List I asked at the meeting last Friday night about the rules change request form being put on line and at this time they said no. The forms is available at the inspection trailer or by r; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00137.html (10,877 bytes)
37. RE: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 14:59:32 -0500; I have used the correct channels The proper form was submitted over a week ago. Got the Ok from Dan Warner that the format was appropriate and correct. they will be looking into during the year. I se; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00138.html (11,128 bytes)
38. Re: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:58:32 -0800; I believe the drop dead date for submitting requests were at the end of October. The rules committee met in early November and submitted to the SCTA/BNI board meeting in November. Yours was not in t; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00141.html (9,911 bytes)
39. RE: Traction control (score: 1): Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:44:37 -0500; I am sure you are correct. I did not want to submit it at the last minute intentionally. I had hoped if given a year to be able to answer any possible questions from the rules committee and provide w; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00142.html (9,577 bytes)
40. RE: Traction control (score: 1): Author: <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 14:49:59 -0700; I don't have a dog in this fight, but that sounds like a wise strategy, Dave I am sure you are correct. I did not want to submit it at the last minute intentionally. I had hoped if given a year to be; /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00143.html (9,707 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]