Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Traction\s+control\s+II\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:52:20 -0800
http://moretraction.com/
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00399.html (7,321 bytes)

2. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:11:59 -0800
A very interesting web site! Just certifies some comments that have been made on this subject. I think that it is very sad, however, that this kind of business is in existence. (And has the gall to
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00400.html (7,920 bytes)

3. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:08:35 -0800
I agree 100% Tom. The ethical standards hammered into me by my parents make me very disappointed in us Americans sometimes. I would be very surprised if this type of traction control hasn't been test
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00405.html (9,163 bytes)

4. RE: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:44:31 -0500
It is just another example of large organizations trying to police what can not be done. It is silly and self serving at best at worst it is draconian.. Consider endlessly being accused of something
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00408.html (9,537 bytes)

5. RE: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 13:59:49 -0800 (PST)
Along this same line of reasoning, any torque biasing differential could be considered traction control. Anybody willing to give up their Quaif diffs? __________________________________ New Yahoo! Ph
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00412.html (9,386 bytes)

6. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 14:32:46 -0800
You can't have it both ways. If it isn't traction control, it probably isn't illegal. If it is traction control, it is cheating! Merry Christmas to all Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/CC
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00413.html (9,232 bytes)

7. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: Ironwigwam2@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:18:25 EST
Tom and Bryan, I have been quietly following this topic with an above average intrigue. We are planning to bring our MC streamliner out this year and planning on using a system of our own design to m
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00420.html (8,845 bytes)

8. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 05:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Rick, even though your comments were reserved for Tom and Bryan, I thought I would chime in anyway (I'm easy to ignore). I don't think you will have any trouble with tech regarding your wheel sensor
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00421.html (10,175 bytes)

9. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: Nt788@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:14:54 EST
Hi Dave I just don't see how this will improve your speed. I think it will save tires or improve controllability in LSR that is! Jack
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00438.html (8,635 bytes)

10. RE: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 14:33:54 -0500
That is the enire point find out what is going wrong do something about it so the car is still controllable even if slower than perfect and then fix it for the next pass. dave
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00440.html (8,933 bytes)

11. RE: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 08:58:00 -0500
Then we are in agreement the definition of traction control is very vague at best. Of all people I had hoped that you would know the difference more than anyone because as far as I know you are in th
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00444.html (10,181 bytes)

12. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:47:17 -0800
I have no quarrel with anything you say in this post. I, too, have a 2002 Pontiac of the Trans Am version. All the modern cars that I know of have some sort of anti-wheel-spin technology. This is de
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00445.html (9,122 bytes)

13. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 18:13:46 -0800
As long as we are being specific, the only way to control traction is with compound, footprint and the coefficient of friction of the road surface. What you all are talking about is wheel spin contro
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00457.html (8,309 bytes)

14. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: Nt788@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:07:03 EST
C'mon Dave, I want my competitors to all use it! Jack
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00469.html (7,880 bytes)

15. RE: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:14:12 -0600
This part of their disclaimer is pretty funny if you think about it: "The Davis Technologies, LLC's products and parts warranties are voided if the vehicle or part is used for competition or if they
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00661.html (8,305 bytes)

16. RE: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "Waldron, James" <James.Waldron@CWUSA.COM>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:49:45 -0500
My favorite one came off a box of drywall screws. "Guaranteed for the life of the product." (So, whenever the screw fails, that's the end of its life and the guarantee expires?) Thanks, Jim W. Bryan;
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00663.html (8,172 bytes)

17. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: "JOE LANCE" <jolylance@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:09:54 -0500
My favorite was the 4"x4"x8' treated wood fence posts I bought--they were guaranteed for 20 years unless I put them in the ground. lance
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00678.html (8,077 bytes)

18. Re: Traction control II (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:35:46 -0800
That's good Neil. 200 mph on I-10 is OK I guess. Bryan
/html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00681.html (7,812 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu