Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tribute\s+to\s+McLeod\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tribute\s+to\s+McLeod\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Tribute to McLeod (score: 1): Author: twojohnsons@home.com; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:44:33 -0400; Windsor--a great nom-de-plume for a Tiger owner(except for Jim Barrett) Here's my long-ago tale of woe. I recall that Tiger was hell on clutches when it had the 288 gears. Starting in that tall first; /html/tigers/2001-05/msg00210.html (7,489 bytes)
2. Re: Tribute to McLeod (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.RR.com>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 08:42:14 -0700; I found the cure for the burning clutch issue and that tall low gear, and it isn't the 2.88's, it's the close ratio gear set choice. The wide ratio set of the Mk II (and other Ford products) slip ri; /html/tigers/2001-05/msg00214.html (8,165 bytes)
3. FW: Tribute to McLeod (score: 1): Author: "Adin,David" <DavidAdin@mercydurango.org>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:32:57 -0600; Hi kids, I have driven a Ford w/ the close ratio box and 2.88 gears - this was meant for Kansas or the plains somewhere as it was unusable in San Francisco (or here in Colorado). I've had my Tiger ab; /html/tigers/2001-05/msg00215.html (9,026 bytes)
4. Re: Tribute to McLeod (score: 1): Author: Colin Mills <Colin.Mills@bluewin.ch>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 22:39:24 +0200; With the torque from the stock 260 and 2.88 rear axle, I have hadf no problem the clutch in 7 years - almost no need for slip and no stall. Of course, it depends how you drive ...; /html/tigers/2001-05/msg00219.html (7,776 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]