Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Triumph\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Triumph\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Ronald R Gates" <Ronald.R.Gates@usa.dupont.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:53:38 -0500; TRIUMPH TR-4 , 1963 race car. must sell due to change of plans. I have owned this car for several years and took almost 1 1/2 years to build. The car only has (2) vintage events since construction. I; /html/fot/2002-03/msg00046.html (7,517 bytes)
2. Fwd: Triumph (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 01 08:34:05 -0700; I have a 59 TR3A that I am parting out. I parked it after the transmission went from the rear end locking up. I rebuilt the transmission, and put in a new used rear end. I then decided to start resto; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00203.html (7,233 bytes)
3. Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Mordy Dunst" <gasket.works@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 20:22:58 -0500; I'm under the impression that BMW owns the rights to the Triumph name. Is this true? Mordy; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00197.html (6,949 bytes)
4. Fw: Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Mordy Dunst" <gasket.works@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:23:33 -0500; will be; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00200.html (7,219 bytes)
5. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:03:02 -0500; There already was a Triumph TR10 -- quite possibly the ugliest car ever produced under the Triumph Badge (although the Herald would give it a run for its money). Think Mini without any of the Mini's; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00207.html (7,724 bytes)
6. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:40:05 EDT; Them's fightin' words, boy! :-) --Andy Andrew Mace, Vice President, Member Services and 10/Herald/Vitesse (Sports 6) Vehicle Consultant The Vintage Triumph Register <www.vtr.org>; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00210.html (7,424 bytes)
7. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: William G Rosenbach <wgrosenbach@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:19:49 -0600; Wasn't that a T-10 and not a TR-10? Seems as though it was a Standard T-10 as well, maybe not. The rear axle was used in the Lotus 6 and early 7s, its replacement had a wider track. Bill ____________; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00212.html (7,995 bytes)
8. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:26:15 -0700; I believe it was a Standard 10 everywhere except North America where it was branded a Triumph 10 because standard means something different in the US than it does in The UK. Joe (C); /html/fot/2001-08/msg00213.html (7,239 bytes)
9. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: "michael cook" <mlcooknj@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:30:05 -0400; Triumph 10 sedan and wagon. This was a pretty good little car. It was a Triumph 10. That was official. T-10 and TR-10 were abbreviations used by dealers, customers and, sometimes, by Standard-Triumph; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00218.html (8,075 bytes)
10. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:28:46 EDT; Right on all counts. Origins were in the Standard 8 (803cc), which evolved into the 948cc Standard 10 (and, in some markets, the extraordinarily handsome :-) Pennant). Standard-Triumph USA's "badge-e; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00219.html (7,674 bytes)
11. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:24:16 -0700; Mike, Would you like to buy one? There is a guy here in Tucson who has both a sedan and Wagon both for sale. Between the two you should be able to construct one pretty good car. Joe (C); /html/fot/2001-08/msg00220.html (7,875 bytes)
12. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:43:35 -0500; Kind of like we refer to the first of the Spitfire line as the Mk. 1, but that is really not its name. It is just the "Spitfire 4." --Rocky (bowing in humble obeisance to Andy and all those who worsh; /html/fot/2001-08/msg00225.html (8,472 bytes)
13. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Bob Kramer" <rgk@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 23:04:07 -0600; Joe, I know you are busy with TR racing this week, but I just got this message from Jim McAndrew after talking with him on the phone tonight, and I want to get this out before I forget in all the exc; /html/fot/1998-07/msg00071.html (8,553 bytes)
14. RE: Triumph (score: 1): Author: Alexander Joseph H <AlexanderJosephH@Waterloo.deere.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 09:02:41 -0500; Saw Tim Suddard this weekend and he reported the sale of the Triumph. Saw Mark Bradakis as well and it may be a bit before he updates the list unless he can do while on the road. Mark...see new addre; /html/fot/1998-07/msg00073.html (9,361 bytes)
15. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: Pugsracer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 17:56:46 EDT; Did anyone that saw Mark at the race notice if he had the TR3 hardtop with him? Pugs; /html/fot/1998-07/msg00074.html (6,528 bytes)
16. Re: Triumph (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@ISIS.MIT.EDU>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 13:02:21 -0400 (EDT); Yep. I can't recall if it was still there when he left Hudson, WI.. later. rml -- Bob Lang Room N42-140Q | This space for rent. Consultant MIT Computer Services | Voice: (617)253-7438 FAX: (617)258-9; /html/fot/1998-07/msg00092.html (6,892 bytes)
17. RE: Triumph (score: 1): Author: "R.M. Bownes III" <bownes@emi.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 17:57:45 -0400; No, it was not. I saw it on the top of a Minivan headed east. iii; /html/fot/1998-07/msg00096.html (6,838 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]