- 1. Triumph axles (score: 1)
- Author: Jack W Drews <vinttr4@forbin.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 08:53:07 +0000
- If you are not a TR racer, delete now. The heavy duty axle shaft project is progressing pretty well, but we desire some input. The TR4A solid axle cars used axle shafts that had a shrunk-on collar in
- /html/fot/1997-06/msg00009.html (7,084 bytes)
- 2. Re: Triumph axles (score: 1)
- Author: R John Lye <rjl6n@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 97 11:30:27 EDT
- Sounds good. One thing to keep in mind is many of us are using tires (and suspension desgins) that put much more force on these axles than they were ever designed for. I'm sure that consideration mot
- /html/fot/1997-06/msg00010.html (7,416 bytes)
- 3. RE: Triumph axles (score: 1)
- Author: Chip Bond <spirals@esinet.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 14:59:31 -0400
- Jack is right. Things are moving well with the axles thanks to Jacks own considerable efforts. Let me update you on what Jack has done: He met with two metallurgist friends of his on Tuesday. Both of
- /html/fot/1997-06/msg00011.html (8,609 bytes)
- 4. Re: Triumph axles (score: 1)
- Author: Malaboge@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 23:19:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Chip Opinions, I mean, correlations-R-us.... Back in the olden days, when racers had treads on their tires, and green dots ruled, I used to always carry a spare axle to the races. In those days, most
- /html/fot/1997-06/msg00016.html (8,997 bytes)
- 5. RE: Triumph axles (score: 1)
- Author: Chip Bond <spirals@esinet.net>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 09:34:34 -0400
- Nick Thanks for the thoughtful input, So Friend, now we have Ken Gillanders who advocates the reduced diameter approach. Bill Thumel and Chuck Botwright who claim it has worked for them and now Nicks
- /html/fot/1997-06/msg00017.html (9,438 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu