- 1. Triumphs at Topeka (score: 1)
- Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@cs.utah.edu>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:54:52 -0600 (MDT)
- Well, FSP and FSPL have finished up their runs. JK Jackson ended up 9th out of 39, and a couple of fellows in a Spitfire ended up 13th and 23rd. Chris Moore ended up second in FSPL, losing to a VW by
- /html/fot/2000-09/msg00061.html (6,734 bytes)
- 2. Re: Triumphs at Topeka (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Lang <LANG@isis.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:23:27 -0400 (EDT)
- Well (regarding Topeka) - I'd really like to have been there myself this year. In fact, I was thinking of going even if I wasn't running. Yes, I'm sick. But I'm used to it... been that way a _long_
- /html/fot/2000-09/msg00062.html (7,715 bytes)
- 3. Re: Triumphs at Topeka (score: 1)
- Author: "Wendy Hart" <hartw@plastekgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:12:06 -0400
- A friend of ours is running his CP Mustang there. He used to own an MGB and his mom has an AH Sprite. I think that makes for enough LBC content to make it OK to root for the CPs... I know what you me
- /html/fot/2000-09/msg00064.html (8,270 bytes)
- 4. Re: Triumphs at Topeka (score: 1)
- Author: wiseman <wiseman@titan.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:50:00 -0400
- Mark, Bob, Wendy and other FOT/autoxers Well, I guess today's results answer the question of whether triumphs are the new "overdogs" in FSP :-) I guess we will have to send in team B for next year. M
- /html/fot/2000-09/msg00065.html (7,609 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu