Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tube\s+shock\s+conv\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tube\s+shock\s+conv\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Tube shock conv. (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:38:14 EDT; Just a question. I am not doing a tube shock replacement on my Midget, but why wouldn't you remove the lever shox altogether? Wouldn't that reduce the weight considerably? Are the lever shox required; /html/mgs/2000-04/msg00400.html (7,686 bytes)
2. Re: Tube shock conv. (score: 1): Author: Dan Dwelley <ddwelley@excite.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT); If you go to ...I think...Spridgetech Inc. They have a front and rear kit for the Midget that utilizes the Lever arm shock mounting points. I think the price was something like $400 for the front kit; /html/mgs/2000-04/msg00402.html (8,994 bytes)
3. Re: Tube shock conv. (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:40:39 -0700; On the B, the lever shock serves as the upper suspension arm. If you removed it, you would have to replace it with something else. This would probably affect the cost effectiveness of the conversion; /html/mgs/2000-04/msg00404.html (9,571 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]