Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tube\s+shock\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tube\s+shock\s+conversion\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Martin Kurrein <mograces@mkurrein.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 02:32:31 +0000; "Purists" shouldn't object. That's the way the factory builds them nowadays. Rutherford's conversion is excellent. Brian knows what he is doing. Panhard rod at the same sort of price. The ride qualit; /html/morgans/1996-12/msg00001.html (9,271 bytes)
2. Tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: "Adamson, John G" <adamsojg@jmu.edu>; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 16:09:32 -0500 (); Hi All, I have written on several occasions, but this time I'm looking for some advice. I have just finished a ground up on a '62 4\4. It has about 140-hp under the hood and I plan to use it on the r; /html/morgans/1996-11/msg00049.html (6,991 bytes)
3. Re: Tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: jblair@exis.net (John T. Blair); Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 17:54:22 -0500; John, What type Ford eng. do you have in there, and what mods did you do to get 140 horses. I know the Dave Bean has the add ons to get you there, but you're talking big bucks!!! Sorry, I can't help; /html/morgans/1996-11/msg00050.html (7,391 bytes)
4. Re: Tube shock conversion (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 18:13:11 +0000; Various people make a tubular damper conversion including the factory and several agents. The best one for my money, (and the one I bought!), is designed and made by Rutherford Engineering here in th; /html/morgans/1996-11/msg00061.html (7,920 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]