Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tubular\s+cross\s+members\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tubular\s+cross\s+members\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Tubular cross members (score: 1): Author: "Larry Embrey" <larry@embreyfamily.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:37:24 -0800; Hello all, I am sure many of you have already seen this, but I want to make sure it gets out to everyone possible. I appologize for the cross posting, but I need to get a feel for any Qty that may be; /html/mgs/2003-02/msg00550.html (9,528 bytes)
2. Re: Tubular cross members (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:15:02 -0800; I'm not really sure than any of these factors apply to a significant extent to a 4-cyl. MGB (when cost is considered), but I'm sure there would be interest from those doing V8 and V6 conversions. Goo; /html/mgs/2003-02/msg00556.html (7,875 bytes)
3. Re: Tubular cross members (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:14:35 -0600; If I were doing a V8 conversion (and I'm not, ok I dream of it) I might be interested. From the thread of a few weeks back, you'd probably want to have a GM 90-degree V-6 mount point as well. However; /html/mgs/2003-02/msg00560.html (8,498 bytes)
4. Re: Tubular cross members (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:15:18 EST; I can't see a big market for these. When you fit something like that, the cutting and welding is considerably more complex and costly than just welding in the mounts for the engine you want to use in; /html/mgs/2003-02/msg00567.html (7,340 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]