Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tuning\s+MGA\s+vs\.\s+MGB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tuning\s+MGA\s+vs\.\s+MGB\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Tuning MGA vs. MGB (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:56:50 EDT; No point guessing about rear wheel power - it's the performance that tells the tale,and with the low weight of the Elva, yours was certainly going to be pretty good. I have also run 12.5:1 1622s and; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00916.html (8,935 bytes)
2. Re: Tuning MGA vs. MGB (score: 1): Author: Howard gentry <zymmer4@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:09:10 -0700 (PDT); Bill, Your remarks are right on the money here. And, that early 1800 B engine did go very well. I lived in England for several years in the early 70's. There were many early B's running on the road t; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00919.html (9,178 bytes)
3. Re: Tuning MGA vs. MGB (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:01:29 EDT; Too bad they are so rare and so little appreciated now! I still race with a 3 main in my 1963 TVR, with HRG head and Webers, and in a 1700 lb. car, it makes a nice combo! (I was going to say 'spritel; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00928.html (7,125 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]