Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tuning\s+the\s+Weber\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tuning\s+the\s+Weber\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Tuning the Weber (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:17:46 -0500; I have mostly completed the tuning of the 45COE Weber on my Bugeye. I have a stock 1275 lower end, an aluminum head, a 266 cam, Isky valve springs, a LCB header, 1-3/4 pipe to a Cherry bomb 22" long.; /html/spridgets/2001-11/msg00927.html (8,528 bytes)
2. Re: Tuning the Weber (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:52:22 EST; Once you go below 34mm chokes on a 45 to get the bottom end throttle response you want you need to be thinking about a 40 DCOE and not the 45. If the car runs really well on the 32mm chokes it will c; /html/spridgets/2001-11/msg00936.html (10,308 bytes)
3. Re: Tuning the Weber (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 09:11:15 +1100; Agree. 34 is OK with a 45 , but a 45 is wasted below that. if and only iff, the 32mm chokes enable less fuel/air flow than the engine can use. No matter how good these rams are, (and I haven't a clu; /html/spridgets/2001-11/msg00940.html (12,636 bytes)
4. Re: Tuning the Weber (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 09:45:16 +1100; I once had a 1380 with 266 cam and I believe we ran 34mm chokes (but it was a while ago so my memory is fuzzy). With a full race 1293cc motor I have used up to 40mm chokes, but these chokes in a dco; /html/spridgets/2001-11/msg00942.html (8,037 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]