Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Twin\s+Cam\s+MGB\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Twin\s+Cam\s+MGB\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Twin Cam MGB? (score: 1): Author: David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 12:17:00 +0100; The Twin Cam MGB, using presumably a marriage of 1,798 block and twin cam heads, is of course feasible, but it is unlikely that any manufacturer would invest the time and money involved in producing; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00000.html (10,035 bytes)
2. Re: Twin Cam MGB? (score: 1): Author: "Kai Radicke" <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 12:12:29 -0400; Correct, I do remember hereing a few things about the Oseries engine being put into limited/random cars from 77 or so on to 80. But I also am pretty sure that what Bruce Durgin had said about a 62 M; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00025.html (8,865 bytes)
3. Re: Twin Cam MGB? (score: 1): Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison); Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 22:53:27 EDT; On Thu, 31 Jul 1997 12:17:00 +0100 David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com> MAJOR SNIP I read in (I believe) Safety Fast (MGCC mag) several months back that someone in the MGCC had inserted an M-16 engine; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00075.html (7,646 bytes)
4. Re: Twin Cam MGB? (score: 1): Author: David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 11:14:00 +0100; Actually the swap you are probably thinking of was a K series (as per the MGF) which has been successfully slotted into the Midget. At one point. Rover Special Products (the defunct specialist off-sh; /html/mgs/1997-08/msg00433.html (8,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]