Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Twin\s+cam\?\s+on\s+ebay\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Twin\s+cam\?\s+on\s+ebay\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Twin cam? on ebay (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:26:21 -0500; Anybody know anything about this twin cam? It has the rear fenders of a 1960 model year yet the VIN is YD3/616. The VIN also doesn't agree with the RHD of the car. I checked the twin cam member list; /html/mgs/2003-08/msg00459.html (7,039 bytes)
2. Re: Twin cam? on ebay (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:24:52 -0700 (PDT); Well, he keeps adding additional information at a high rate, like the fact that it's not really an 'original RHD' car as noted in his original blurb but converted from LHD using 'original RHD parts',; /html/mgs/2003-08/msg00462.html (7,401 bytes)
3. Re: Twin cam? on ebay (score: 1): Author: Rocky Frisco <rock@rocky-frisco.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:04:04 -0500; Possible answer: since sports car races are almost always on clockwise tracks, having the driver's weight on the right makes turning just that fraction better. This was the accepted wisdom back in th; /html/mgs/2003-08/msg00466.html (7,640 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]