Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Type\s+R\:\s+G\s+Stock\s+in\s+2000\?\s+\"Dreaming\.\.\.\.\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Type\s+R\:\s+G\s+Stock\s+in\s+2000\?\s+\"Dreaming\.\.\.\.\"\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 07:33:34 -0700; Careful Tom... Ok, just how much _does_ your silence cost??? ;-) How's this - a 1987 Yugo in HS - now that the fast cars are gone, this is the hot ticket!!! Mark my words... Kevin; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00034.html (8,278 bytes)
2. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 12:35:16 -0700; The Audi TT would be at best competitive with the "regular" GS cars. I doesn't have the A4 multilink suspension, it's only FWD with no limited slip, and it weighs 2900 (ask Curtis Ames who weighed hi; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00199.html (10,272 bytes)
3. RE: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 12:54:43 -0700; Of course that's what they thought of the A4, and DSM cars... :-) And, as we know, German cars seem to be faster than the sum of their parts. The Toyota is supposed to weight 24xx lbs (Autoweek artic; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00206.html (11,327 bytes)
4. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 12:57:33 -0700; The new Celica is listed at 2560 pounds with a 60/40 weight distribution. Big brakes. 6 speed is an option. VVTL-i engine for the GT-S model with 180hp @ 7600rpm. 16x6.5 rims. Great price at $24k. I; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00207.html (9,239 bytes)
5. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 13:11:12 -0700; According the the new Road and Track it is 2500#. Scott Meyers; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00210.html (7,906 bytes)
6. RE: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Moore, John" <jmoore@spyglass.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 15:19:07 -0500; The Audi TT Quattro is available in the US at this time and one of the people I work with has one parked next to me as we speak. It only has the 180 HP engine and the "limited slip" is a series of c; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00211.html (8,623 bytes)
7. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:12:51 -0700; The A4 wasn't that of a mystery to me :-). I picked the A4 based on the numbers and the suspension goodies. Both cars have good low end torque. Lets see. TT, 2900/170 = 17.059 for torque to weight. A; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00212.html (12,529 bytes)
8. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:19:41 -0700; The 225hp Quattro TT will be interesting. If in GS, it would be the only thing I would consider running against a Type R or Talon. If AS, it would have a chance also, depending on what you can get th; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00215.html (10,214 bytes)
9. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <buttheat@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:22:21 -0700; According to a racing scale, it's 2900 ;-). Curtis's car was bone stock. You should have seen his eyes when he found out how much it really weighed. For a reference, I weighed my Z3 coupe again, and; /html/autox/1999-09/msg00217.html (8,541 bytes)
10. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 18:24:11 -0700; Uh, for **US** in D Stock? No way you might underestimate the potential here, right Dan? Cars about the same weight, 50 more horsepower, and a bunch more suspension,,,,,yeah, sounds about fair ;-) Do; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01410.html (8,510 bytes)
11. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 21:32:38 EDT; << Uh, for **US** in D Stock? No way you might underestimate the potential here, right Dan?>> Not at all... =^) <<Cars about the same weight>> Talk about underestimation...my car weights ~3200lbs...; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01413.html (8,814 bytes)
12. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "Phillip S. Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 20:48:36 -0400; Yep, they sure do. They also have wider 15" wheels, (compared to the Neon's 14.") And at 195hp(?), about 45 more hp than the ACR coupe, and nearly 60 hp more than an ACR sedan. Torque numbers are abo; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01420.html (8,192 bytes)
13. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: "David Fauth" <dfauth@net-mgmt.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:04:21 -0600; Actually, the Type R has 15x6" wheels, as compared to the 14x6" of the Neon. Both cars can only fit 225 width tires. True, the Type R has 2 ft-lbs less torque(130 vs 132), but the peak comes at 7500r; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01548.html (8,998 bytes)
14. RE: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 08:14:40 -0700; And don't forget the 2000 Audi TT w/180hp and WAY more torque than a Type R. Oh, and the new Toyota Celica with 180 hp as well. Seems like GS is getting redefined with tons of competitive cars. Heck,; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01570.html (9,914 bytes)
15. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 08:28:47 -0700; The Type R's exclusive white, aluminum wheels have a 5 mm greater offset than the GS-R. The 15x6JJ alloy wheels also feature a larger, five-bolt lug pattern for increased rigidity. and.......... * 19; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01574.html (9,683 bytes)
16. RE: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Mark R Jahnke <mjahnke@shrike.depaul.edu>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 10:22:13 -0500 (CDT); I'd out all the money in the world up against that one! If the TYPE R is such a no torque vehicle, then why are they kicking ass at a lot of events? Mark 98 ITR #109 Supercharged TU #923; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01575.html (8,530 bytes)
17. Re: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Mtnman3620@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:56:50 EDT; << I still think it makes sense to let it redefine G Stock with the Talons and Firebirds >> There was an earlier post about other cars that will be coming (possibly to G stock) out soon and with that; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01579.html (8,595 bytes)
18. RE: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 09:11:17 -0700; Careful what you wish for :-) As someone else already pointed out, it is low first gear and lots of revs. We had five (5) Type R's in Sacramento Saturday - and they say they are hard to find... Just; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01582.html (9,980 bytes)
19. RE: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Phil Osborne <posborne@minuteman-ups.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:16:34 -0500; Lots of stuff deleted re: Type R Sounds like it has a few more things than a Neon :-) I still think it makes sense to let it redefine G Stock with the Talons and Firebirds, and perhaps move some othe; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01583.html (9,003 bytes)
20. RE: Type R: G Stock in 2000? "Dreaming...." (score: 1): Author: Mark R Jahnke <mjahnke@shrike.depaul.edu>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:15:34 -0500 (CDT); Only a couple... Ar ACR's that cheap? I am going to assume that the 2000 model TYPE R(available in black or yellow onl, so it says from rumormill) will be around $23.5K. That is just my guess, I cou; /html/autox/1999-08/msg01584.html (9,283 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]