Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*U20\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*U20\s+Questions\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: "Victor Laury" <vlaury@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 23:15:42 -0700; With all you hear from me, you might think my opinion is crazy, but I think the U-20 is a very reliable motor. Ok, Ok, The 60,000 mile timing chain is a weak link (oops), but it's well known. I thin; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-06/msg00000.html (10,013 bytes)
2. RE: U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: "Hall, Phillip" <Phillip.Hall@msfc.nasa.gov>; Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 08:06:46 -0500; I totally agree!! I have autocrossed 1600's for years in the past - pedal almost wired to the floor - never broke one. I have run my present '66 very hard for the last 6 years with no breaks. My bro; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-06/msg00008.html (9,601 bytes)
3. Re: U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: "Kyle Hagemann" <kwhcpa@addler.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 08:54:39 -0700; When is a Datsun not a Datsun? Well, Paul, having owned both a 1600 and a 2000, and being much more "in to" the L-powered 510 and 240 series, I'm a little more impartial. But, my 2000's been broken f; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-06/msg00024.html (11,299 bytes)
4. Re: U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: "Mike Kerr" <mikekerr@innercite.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 09:37:39 -0700; the u20 has more power so you can beat on it that much more. it bottom end is stronger biult, but has a much longer stroke so there is more stress on it. the double chains work fine if you are willin; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-06/msg00026.html (9,185 bytes)
5. Re: U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 19:39:48 -0400; I guess it's 50/50 about why 2Ls break or have more problems than 1.6Ls, but to me the design of the 2L does leave something to be desired. It's too bad they didn't get the development of the L serie; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-06/msg00045.html (11,805 bytes)
6. Re: U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: Jim Tyler <toplessdatsun@ga.prestige.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 17:19:12 -0400; I have had L's, R's, U's, J's,and VG30E's and DE's so I am pretty impartial too. The 300K stuff is certainly not the norm on the L's. I have seen so many (street L's) splated around the machine shop; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-06/msg00094.html (11,361 bytes)
7. Re: U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: "Mike Kerr" <mikekerr@innercite.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 08:10:59 -0700; For street use the U20 is fine , I beat the hell of the motor and it holds up ...yes things go wrong , once I bought a fancy shift knob , was behind this 914 , came to a strait away , went to dumb it; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-06/msg00174.html (14,327 bytes)
8. Re: U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: CalSpeed@aol.com; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 14:30:49 EDT; << blew the clutch up getting on the though way trying to get ahead of the semi coming down the road , was at 8500 rpms in second gear.. >> Excuse me.... but how fast was that Semi going? 100+ ? Cals; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-06/msg00193.html (7,219 bytes)
9. U20 Questions (score: 1): Author: "Pam and Paul Bauman" <plhbauman@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 20:45:03 -0700; What's up with this U20 thing? After several years of going through turns sideways, and generally making a Roadsterass of myself, I refuse to believe that 2000 drivers are that much harder on their c; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-05/msg01199.html (7,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]