- 1. Undertaking Re: tailgaters* (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:40:41 EDT
- My two pence worth. I am a big believer in lane discipline and don't use the 'outside overtaking lane' which must NEVER, EVER be called the fast lane, especially in a court of law, except when I need
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00313.html (8,594 bytes)
- 2. Re: Undertaking Re: tailgaters* (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 17:12:34 -0400
- And in Canada, an undertaker will bury you. -- Original Message -- /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00315.html (7,027 bytes)
- 3. Re: Undertaking Re: tailgaters* (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 00:09:00 +0100
- I guess I agree, but do move over to the inside lane if the road ahead is clear for a few hundred yards. I just don't see the point of having 3 lane motorways and then the traffic only using the midd
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00327.html (9,515 bytes)
- 4. Re: Undertaking Re: tailgaters* (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 06:42:27 EDT
- And you get to undertake all those middle lane cars? /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.tea
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00360.html (7,333 bytes)
- 5. Re: Undertaking Re: tailgaters* (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 14:50:53 +0100
- No Daniel, If I am traveling faster I move over to pass them on the correct side. But it is safer and easier travelling if you can see a good way ahead, and this I think is better if travelling at th
- /html/spridgets/2003-08/msg00369.html (8,087 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu