- 1. VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: "Bjørn Schage" <schage@online.no
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 09:32:22 +0100
- Hi Will. I have the folding windscreen kit on both my Morgans ( -62 +4 4-str. & -69 +8) with the Brooklands. They look great, but you must beware that the body "tapers" slightly from the scuttle forw
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00086.html (7,910 bytes)
- 2. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: FPS3 <FPS3@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 10:27:41 EST
- I also noticed the tightness of the Rutter kit on my car. Cured by a vise (aluminum jaw covers) and a big Cressent wrench. I twisted the lower part of the mount to bring the two parallel. Also "snugg
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00089.html (8,280 bytes)
- 3. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: William Zehring <zehrinwa@UMDNJ.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 10:49:44 -0500
- enjoy Hmmm. That's an important point. As I recollect, my frame is bolted to the body side mounts by four or six hex head bolts. It'd take about five mins. to remove it, I recon. The next question wo
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00090.html (8,496 bytes)
- 4. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Speetjens" <joe@nhms.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 13:02:46 -0600
- While you are talking about folding screen and Brooklands, have you ever seen a half high screen that is made by cutting an existing screen? The top edge is glass. It is simmilar to what hot rods use
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00093.html (9,511 bytes)
- 5. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: Joseph DeLuca <DELUCAJ@mops.wl.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 15:15:49 -0500
- I'll bet the cut windshield would look sporty indeed, but I have to ask the obvious question... What would snap your bonnet to when it rains? Joe DeLuca '62 yellow 4/4 Sparta, NJ
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00094.html (7,848 bytes)
- 6. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Speetjens" <joe@nhms.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 15:24:13 -0600
- -- the obvious question... ever The Pollock of where I
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00095.html (8,337 bytes)
- 7. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Nogueira <nogera@prodigy.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 98 20:57:44 -0500
- -- [ From: Bob Nogueira * EMC.Ver #3.1a ] -- Will If you think you will be going for just short drives I'd get the Brookland screen and pass on the folding screen ( Its a little hard to carry the win
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00097.html (10,252 bytes)
- 8. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: FPS3 <FPS3@aol.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:12:41 EST
- Phil got the idea for a cut windscreen from my car. I got the idea from a Dusenberg. Very tasty looking. I made mine from old Mog windscreen that was in a car that burned and the top was twisted beyo
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00102.html (7,921 bytes)
- 9. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: "Vern Dale-Johnson" <vern_dj@email.msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:49:00 -0500
- When it rains you don't snap on the hood, you drive faster! That way the rain does't get to you. obvious question... ever The of where I
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00105.html (8,451 bytes)
- 10. Re: VS: folding windshield (score: 1)
- Author: "Vern Dale-Johnson" <vern_dj@email.msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:41:12 -0500
- I agree, the folded screen is more in the way than not -- better to remove it entirely. I do just this on my 66 +4. With regards to mounting the Brooklands screens, I've mounted mine "backwards" -- t
- /html/morgans/1998-03/msg00108.html (10,272 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu