Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vacuum\s+advance\,\s+pt\.\s+2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vacuum\s+advance\,\s+pt\.\s+2\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Vacuum advance, pt. 2 (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 15:46:56 -0600 (CST); Hi, all. I'm the one who asked about dizzy vacuum advance units. While corresponding with one list member about this, a rather brilliant idea hit me. I realized that I could test the operation of the; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00423.html (8,856 bytes)
2. RE: Vacuum advance, pt. 2 (score: 1): Author: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 17:59:00 -0800 (PST); Hi, all. I'm the one who asked about dizzy vacuum advance units. While corresponding with one list member about this, a rather brilliant idea hit me. I realized that I could test the operation of the; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00428.html (9,355 bytes)
3. Re: Vacuum advance, pt. 2 (score: 1): Author: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 18:39:00 -0500 (EST); Both. Rich mixture tends to pop out the tailpipe, while lean pops back through the carbs. I call the latter "frontfire", although nobody else does <grin>. I'm not sure about the bit of it traveling a; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00433.html (8,373 bytes)
4. Re: Vacuum advance, pt. 2 (score: 1): Author: Craig Wiper <craigw@sonic.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 19:17:37 -0800; Hi Todd, My '74 B used to backfire before I removed the smog equipment. When I reinstall the equipment (by the way I have acquired as many new smog parts as possible) the backfiring returns, but ever; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00436.html (8,277 bytes)
5. Re: Vacuum advance, pt. 2 (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:42:29 -0600 (CST); Okay. This suggests to me that I have an overly rich mixture with the throttle plates fully closed (I'm not getting any funny stuff coming back through the carbs; that sounds scary!). But my plugs ar; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00449.html (9,437 bytes)
6. Re: Vacuum advance, pt. 2 (score: 1): Author: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 21:33:00 -0800 (PST); Christopher Reichle suggested a burnt exhaust valve. I don't have a compression gauge (maybe now is a good time to go get one...), but I set the valve lash to spec at the same time as I was fiddling; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00467.html (7,699 bytes)
7. Re: Vacuum advance, pt. 2 (score: 1): Author: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 11:49:52 -0500 (EST); This strongly suggests to me you have leaky valve guides on cylinders 1 and/or 2. You are not supposed to have a "considerable" buildup of deposits on todays gasolines. The Spitfire did this because; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00480.html (10,177 bytes)
8. Re: Vacuum advance, pt. 2 (score: 1): Author: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 15:40:00 -0800 (PST); look below ** This strongly suggests to me you have leaky valve guides on cylinders 1 and/or 2. You are not supposed to have a "considerable" buildup of deposits on todays gasolines. The Spitfire did; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00486.html (8,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]