Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Value\s+Trivia\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Value\s+Trivia\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:51:58 EDT; A question I posed to another group might find interest here. In the old car game, the convertible version of a car usually brings more than the coupe. Can you think of any cars in which the coupe ve; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00694.html (7,683 bytes)
2. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:05:11 -0500; Well, off the top of my head, a '63 Split Window Coupe has got to be more valuable. I can't think of others at this time. -- Paul T. Root E/Mail: proot@iaces.com 600 Stinson Blvd, Fl 1S PAG: +1 (877); /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00697.html (8,382 bytes)
3. RE: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:24:58 -0600; For the "uninformed" Paul is speaking of a Corvette. Larry Hoy /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00698.html (7,922 bytes)
4. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:32:43 -0500; Ah the dreaded self response. This got me thinking why. Most convertibles are valued higher than their coupe counterpart because, generally, there are more coupes than convertibles. With a few notabl; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00700.html (9,857 bytes)
5. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <budkrueger@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:04:35 -0400; Immediate thought to my mind: Mercedes 300SL Gullwing. /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00705.html (10,613 bytes)
6. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:19:59 EDT; - - - - - - - - - - - - Mercedes 300 SLR gull wing and 1963 Corvette split window come to mind. Allen Hefner SCCA Philly Region Rally Steward '77 Midget '75 Midget "The Project" '92 Mitsubishi Expo L; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00706.html (8,138 bytes)
7. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:36:10 -0700 (PDT); Good question...! Does the TRiumph GT6 fit in here? Or does the 6-cylinder engine cause it to be something other than a hardtop Spitfire? == Dan DiBiase The Garden State (What Exit?) '76 MGB Tourer (; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00708.html (8,194 bytes)
8. RE: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: KGROWLER@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:23:52 EDT; <<<Can you think of any cars in which the coupe version is worth significantly more than the convertible? There aren't many, but there are a couple you should be able to pick up on.>>> I have no refe; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00711.html (8,193 bytes)
9. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: "Mark and kathy LaPierre" <mgtrcars@galaxyinternet.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:44:39 -0500; I'm going with the 74.5 BGT. Not valuable yet but with only 1247 brought to the US I'm rolling my dice and hangin on to mine. Aconite with Autumn leaf, what a head turner. This is my wager and I'm st; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00714.html (9,245 bytes)
10. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:48:00 -0600; Would the TR4 surry top qualify as a coupe? I thought when the surry top option was purchased the car had no soft top. I think the TR4 surry top is worth more. Paul: <<<snip>>> Could the other coupe; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00715.html (8,355 bytes)
11. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:48:37 EDT; Nope - different engine (hey, my rules!) No, I was looking for models that are essentially the same except for body style, so that the difference in value wasn't attributable to some rare engine or s; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00716.html (8,648 bytes)
12. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:50:50 EDT; Yes, and the also mentioned 63 Corvette. Well done. Any others you can think of? BIll /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00717.html (8,349 bytes)
13. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:57:27 EDT; Above the convertible version? What auction catalogue are you reading from???;-) Bill /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00718.html (8,408 bytes)
14. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: "Mark and kathy LaPierre" <mgtrcars@galaxyinternet.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:16:45 -0500; Any car with smoke screens, oil slicks, mapping capability, ejection seats, missile launchers has got to be valuable. That was standard equipment wasn't it? Mark - /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00720.html (8,857 bytes)
15. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:12:52 EDT; I hadn't thought of it, but maybe it shouldn't qualify - not really a coupe. Otherwise you'd have to argue that the Porsche 911 Targa was a coupe, which would make the regular 911 a what.......coupe; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00721.html (8,654 bytes)
16. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: Zubrovka <zubrovka@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:56:16 -0400; 1940-41 Lincoln Continental Coupe (less coupes built and coupes were crafted from the original convertible design) John /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.tea; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00724.html (9,042 bytes)
17. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:07:02 -0700 (PDT); Ok, another try - the Sunbeam Alpine fastback - British Car recently had an article on them, can't remember the specific name... Although I am not sure if it was a factory conversion or outside job.; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00725.html (8,638 bytes)
18. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:15:22 EDT; The question isn't what cars have coupe versions, it is which ones have coupe versions that are worth more than the convertibles. The Sunbeam Harrington Lemans is a fair call but are you suggesting t; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00727.html (8,787 bytes)
19. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kmr@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:51:55 -0400; The surrey top was a weather option (just like a removable hardtop), not a body style though, so it may not fit Bill's intentions here. To answer your question, yes the surrey topped TR4s are worth c; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00728.html (8,807 bytes)
20. Re: Value Trivia (score: 1): Author: "Mark and kathy LaPierre" <mgtrcars@galaxyinternet.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:54:04 -0500; OK somebody just greased my wheels, how bout the TR4 fast back/hardtop, very few made and just saw a couple of articles where a couple of gents restored a couple of these cars. One was red and the ot; /html/mgs/2002-04/msg00730.html (8,598 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]