- 1. Valve Cutouts - Necessary? (score: 1)
- Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@apphosting.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 00:10:28 +1100
- Hi all, About to get some work done on the 1600's motor to fix that broken crank issue and make it go a little bit wilder <G>. I am fitting a high lift cam and flat top +040 pistons which should take
- /html/mgs/2000-03/msg00207.html (7,887 bytes)
- 2. Re: Valve Cutouts - Necessary? (score: 1)
- Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 15:37:39 -0600
- lift cam and flat top +040 pistons .... 3.01"? I am using an Early MGB head with the 1.56" Inlets and the 1.344" Exhausts. .... I hear tell via Barney's Website that with the 1600 Mk2 at 1622cc the c
- /html/mgs/2000-03/msg00227.html (10,505 bytes)
- 3. Re: Valve Cutouts - Necessary? (score: 1)
- Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@apphosting.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 01:27:18 +1100
- Thanks for the info. I realised I'd made a mistake first thing in the AM. That's what happens when you are up at 2am with blurry vision looking at websites and typing emails. <G> :) I think I've dec
- /html/mgs/2000-03/msg00246.html (7,718 bytes)
- 4. Re: Valve Cutouts - Necessary? (score: 1)
- Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:11:54 -0600
- lift .... The CR will be up at around 9.3:1 but .... Cam timing is Inlet: 37-75 Exhaust: 71-41. Cam lift: .281" LSA: 109deg. Overlap:78deg. Duration: 292. The .281 cam lift combined with your 1.6:1 r
- /html/mgs/2000-03/msg00276.html (7,573 bytes)
- 5. Re: Valve Cutouts - Necessary? (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:18:29 EST
- <The CR will be up at around 9.3:1 but according to PB this is ok, and with the timing of that cam should be fine. I don't mind running premium fuel either, it's a fun car after all not my DD. For an
- /html/mgs/2000-03/msg00283.html (7,024 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu