Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Valve\s+Noise\s+Revisited\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Valve\s+Noise\s+Revisited\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Valve Noise Revisited (score: 1): Author: "Rich & Kerry Peterson" <kerry3@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:47:58 -0400; I've been following the thread about valve noise with some interest as I recently concluded that my 77B with 115,000 was a tad too noisy. The valves are adjusted correctly (although I will have to ch; /html/mgs/2001-06/msg00786.html (6,978 bytes)
2. Re: Valve Noise Revisited (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Fayne" <fayne@attglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:52:07 -0500; One immediate thing that comes to mind when you run tighter clearances is that you run the risk of burning one or more valves. With a tighter clearance, the valve opens sooner and closes later, effec; /html/mgs/2001-06/msg00798.html (8,150 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]