Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vega\s+engines\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vega\s+engines\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Vega engines (score: 1): Author: William Eastman <william.eastman@medtronic.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1998 21:06:55 -0600; Worst engine ever? The Vega block used an aluminum that was loaded with silicon. The cylinders were honed to expose the silicon and the pistons (iron plated) road on the silicon, not the aluminum. Th; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00493.html (7,087 bytes)
2. Re: Vega engines (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1998 22:22:19 -0600; Which makes me wonder about a Cosworth Vega motor. They were only built in 74 and 75 (I think) and had a four-valve Cosworth aluminum head instead of the silly design-by-commitee GM think. With the C; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00496.html (7,307 bytes)
3. Re: Vega engines (score: 1): Author: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 98 13:00:46 -0500; Now I had a Vega once. Never had a bit of problem with it. But I knew of others that failed. The major difference was who was driving and consequently HOW they were driving. The ones that failed wer; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg00536.html (8,116 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]