Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vntage\s+dry\s+sump\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vntage\s+dry\s+sump\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Vntage dry sump (score: 1): Author: Gt6steve@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:59:16 EDT; What's the general opinion among the various vintage organizations regarding dry sumping a production car? Was it permissible in 69 or 72 GCR's? Is it permissible in your club? I'm sure we've all se; /html/fot/2004-05/msg00234.html (7,026 bytes)
2. Re: Vntage dry sump (score: 1): Author: Henry Frye <henry@henryfrye.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:24:41 -0400; I think most cars in the east that run vintage appear to be built to SVRA specs. SVRA GR reads "Wet sump may not be converted to dry sump." http://svra.com/rules.htm FWIW, Les Gonda just built an MG; /html/fot/2004-05/msg00235.html (7,565 bytes)
3. Re: Vntage dry sump (score: 1): Author: Gt6steve@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:46:03 EDT; Thanx Henry, That's the answer I expected. While I don't expect to ever run with SVRA I'd still like to be legal. Steve Steve, I think most cars in the east that run vintage appear to be built to SVR; /html/fot/2004-05/msg00236.html (7,611 bytes)
4. Re: Vntage dry sump (score: 1): Author: William G Rosenbach <wgrosenbach@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:38:20 -0600; I was sure Rocky Mountain Vintage Racing has an exception to the GCR/PCS that allows the use of dry sump systems on all production cars since I've seen a few. Just checked the exceptions and they do; /html/fot/2004-05/msg00237.html (7,896 bytes)
5. Re: Vntage dry sump (score: 1): Author: "Robert Dardano" <19to1tr6@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 21:07:20 -0400; We should all vote to let Steve design and develop -- Original Message -- From: <Gt6steve@aol.com> To: <henry@henryfrye.com> Cc: <FOT@autox.team.net> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:46 AM Subject: Re:; /html/fot/2004-05/msg00241.html (8,183 bytes)
6. Re: Vntage dry sump (score: 1): Author: Gt6steve@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 21:12:21 EDT; I'm game for the concept, is there any development money out there? We should all vote to let Steve design and develop; /html/fot/2004-05/msg00242.html (6,875 bytes)
7. Re: Vntage dry sump (score: 1): Author: EDWARD BARNARD <edwardbarnard@prodigy.net>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 18:47:56 -0700 (PDT); Steve: We had this issue in CVAR last year. A production car that did not come with a dry sump from the factory is reclassified and will run with the next higher group. In this case it lumped a Lotus; /html/fot/2004-05/msg00243.html (8,099 bytes)
8. Re: Vntage dry sump (score: 1): Author: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:11:04 -0400; Sam Halkias runs a dry sump in his TR6 (don't remember which class), something which I have been thinking about for my car. Unfortunately, the front chassis cross-member prevent me from dropping the; /html/fot/2004-05/msg00250.html (7,900 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]