Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vote\s+for\s+your\s+own\s+class\s+$Was\:\s+Ladies\s+classes$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vote\s+for\s+your\s+own\s+class\s+$Was\:\s+Ladies\s+classes$\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Vote for your own class (Was: Ladies classes) (score: 1): Author: Bob Monday <boysrus_racing@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:42:44 -0700 (PDT); Can we apply the same concept to D-Stock? "We like it the way it is." (Did any of you other DS guys ask for that whole stock class change thing?) ;-) Bob Monday -- Paula Whitney <pwhitney@shamroc.com; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01290.html (7,475 bytes)
2. Re: Vote for your own class (Was: Ladies classes) (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:43:45 -0500; --Original Message-- == Nope. As a matter of fact, except for the Super Duper Stock folks, I don't think that any of the reclassing requests came from the racers themselves. No worries for me though.; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01321.html (7,815 bytes)
3. Re: Vote for your own class (Was: Ladies classes) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 06:34:59 -0700; This is interesting to me Eric - how would you have any clue what letters came in? AB "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com> on 09/27/2000 01:43:45 AM Please respond to "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01337.html (8,628 bytes)
4. RE: Vote for your own class (Was: Ladies classes) (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:37:16 -0500; I wouldn't. We get no communication from the SEB until after a decision has been made. I'm sorry but putting proposals in teeny tiny small print in the Fastrack just is not a sufficient enough forum; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01343.html (9,621 bytes)
5. Re: Vote for your own class (Was: Ladies classes) (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:26:48 -0500; Or - gasp! - might some of the proposal be actually based on Participation Levels?? Say it isn't so! Nationals 2000 - Combined O+L Numbers: 1.) B/S 69 entries 2.) S/S 65 3.) F/S 60 4.) C/S 60 5.) G/S; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01365.html (9,306 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]