Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*WANTED\:\s+TAC\s+INSPECTOR\s+\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*WANTED\:\s+TAC\s+INSPECTOR\s+\!\!\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. WANTED: TAC INSPECTOR !!! (score: 1): Author: kjenssen@juno.com (Kirt Jenssen); Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 21:12:40 EST; I have received a number of repies concerning TAC inspections in the MIDWEST area. Can a TAC representative update the list concerning availability of inspections? TAC requests received from the foll; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00338.html (7,032 bytes)
2. RE: WANTED: TAC INSPECTOR !!! (score: 1): Author: dondaves@ix.netcom.com (Don Daves); Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 22:46:14 -0600 (CST); I knew it would happen - sooner or later. . . As the requests pour in from across this great country, the need for, and appreciation of, the Tac program becomes self-evident. No need to defend this p; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00343.html (8,695 bytes)
3. Re[2]: WANTED: TAC INSPECTOR !!! (score: 1): Author: nicholsj@oakwood.org; Date: Mon, 24 Mar 97 13:24:32 EST; 'So, to the Tac bashers (best not to use names)' Don Daves Uhh Ohh, Sounds like a blacklist (or a TACtlesslist) is forming, so beware! The sTACk of e-mails commenting on percieved TACtless and TACky; /html/tigers/1997-03/msg00379.html (9,316 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]