Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*WRX\s+Classing\s+\(fanning\s+the\s+flames\.\.\.\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: "JCGZ3" <JCGZ3@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 00:23:10 -0800
Right on Kimball :-) Along with your best of bread example is an example of how classing similar type cars together is not being done with these cars either. The best example is the 225hp TT Quattro
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00002.html (11,096 bytes)

2. Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: "Mr. DSM" <mrdsm@excite.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:44:40 -0800 (PST)
of 217 HP Talon!! Even tough they don't make them any more, they seem to be getting stronger lately! Watch out! :) No, it is not 217 (that is a torque numbers for the new WRX). Talon has 210 HP. I ne
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00014.html (8,830 bytes)

3. Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Lloyd <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2001 09:29:57 -0800
And Don't be suprised to see an americanized version of the turbo AWD lancer in the next few years, seems DSM got out of the american turbo AWD market just as it is ramping up.... I was at the mitsu
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00018.html (7,477 bytes)

4. Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: Ron <nottingham@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 12:56:32 -0500
Yeah, and Nissan will have their R35 Skyline GT-R over here in a few years :-) Ron N. - Dalton, Ga
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00019.html (7,722 bytes)

5. Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Marshall" <emarshal@radiks.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:09:12 -0600
A friend of mine leased a '01 eclipse spyder a few months back and that dealer (Metro Mitsubishi of Minneapolis, Omaha, and who knows where else...) told us that the rep was going to be bringing an L
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00023.html (8,292 bytes)

6. Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Holliday" <bradholliday@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 02:25:22
Admittedly, I don't know much about Audis, but it seems to me that if you move them to GS based on the "best in breed" rule, then you also need to move the BMW M3 and M3 Lightweight to GS to be fair
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00039.html (7,956 bytes)

7. Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:39:36 -0500
Not that it matters to me much, but if an Audi S4 really does weigh 3700lbs, the M3 is about 800lbs lighter... There's only, what, a 10HP difference? Not hard to see at all why they're in different
/html/autox/2001-02/msg00048.html (7,475 bytes)

8. WRX Classing (fanning the flames...) (score: 1)
Author: "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:39:55 -0800
Have you sent these thoughts to the SEB, Jim? I will if you will... Also booting the Audi S4, and 225hp TT up to AS when their lesser brethren stay in GS is a violation of the often applied "Best of
/html/autox/2001-01/msg00811.html (9,172 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu