Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wally\s+Swift\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wally\s+Swift\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: "Eric Gibeaut" <sunbeams@sc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:26:58 -0500; I just read Larry Paulick's note referring to Wally Swift and his Alpine. I am fortunate to have become the "next caretaker" of Wally's Alpine and I would love to hear from anyone with personal stori; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00420.html (6,679 bytes)
2. Re: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: sosnaenergyconsulting <sosnaenergyconsulting@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:17:17 -0800; Hi Eric: I read about Wally's car and regretted that as a left-coaster, I never got a chance to see it. Congratulations on acquiring the car and the best of luck to you in your autocross endeavors! A; /html/tigers/2005-01/msg00445.html (7,299 bytes)
3. Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:30:37 EDT; I was recently reading a 1998 interview with Wally Swift. I'd like to hear some comments from listers regarding his words. It is commonly thought that Chrysler buying Sunbeam caused the demise of the; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00226.html (7,387 bytes)
4. Re: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: "Will Seay" <wseay@ntelos.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:48:20 -0400; It was clear that Chrysler had a problem with the Ford engine in the car. Their advertising referred to "an American V8". Chrysler put a 5 Year, 50K warranty on the Alpine but wouldn't do the same fo; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00227.html (7,676 bytes)
5. Re: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:02:57 EDT; Uncle Wally talked with me many times. He did say that it was the Feds that killed the Tiger. Particulary the 5mph bumper standard as well as the heigth. He said that Chyrsler did think about raising; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00228.html (7,542 bytes)
6. RE: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: "Robin Young" <robin02@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:52:44 -0400; I do not recall the dealer name in Pensacola but, I do remember that he blamed the requirement for a collapsible steering column for 1968 on the end of Tiger production. Pensacola is the home of Nava; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00231.html (7,909 bytes)
7. Re: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: "Ross" <phulse@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:45:25 -0700; Exactly, and is the reason most Mark II's are in Canada. They did not meet US safety standards of the day.; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00233.html (7,822 bytes)
8. Re: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:34:41 -0400; Wally was a neighbor, and had a pristine untouched Tiger, that I looked at over the 6 years that I restored my Tiger. During disassembly, and with PO's changes, I did not completely know what a Tiger; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00239.html (9,350 bytes)
9. Re: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:18:04 EDT; I was recently reading a 1998 interview with Wally Swift. I'd like to hear some comments from listers regarding his words. Never doubt what Wally Swift ever said about Rootes or their products! John; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00242.html (7,108 bytes)
10. Re: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: Theodore Brown <tbrown@midcoast.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:10:22 -0400; Hi Folks: I think Robin has it correct, at least as far as my memory of an explanation for the demise of the Tiger in 1968. It was the safety regs, and specifically the requirement for a collapsible; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00245.html (7,720 bytes)
11. Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:35:26 EDT; My last quote from Wally Swift gave us something to think about. It seems we can conclude that Wally was right, the Tiger production ended because of Federal safety regulations. However, if the car h; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00255.html (7,796 bytes)
12. Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:31:24 EDT; I'm surprised. I never saw one comment on Wally Swift's quote about Tigers getting a special, stronger engine than Ford products of the time. Mark L.; /html/tigers/2006-06/msg00298.html (6,963 bytes)
13. RE: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:25:08 -0400; Here's Wally's quote from 1998. ("British Car") "The engine we put in the Tiger was from Ford's Industrial Division. It was a heavy duty engine and different from the 260 you got over It took a bit; /html/tigers/2006-08/msg00005.html (9,959 bytes)
14. RE: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: "J. D. Johnson" <j_d_johnson@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:45:33 -0700; Where is it written that the Industrial Division of Ford made engines? JD; /html/tigers/2006-08/msg00006.html (7,031 bytes)
15. RE: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:09:02 -0400; You would need a Ford insider to answer that question completely. What we do know is that Rootes ordered engines through the Ford Industrial Division and the Ford Industrial Division was able to sup; /html/tigers/2006-08/msg00007.html (7,730 bytes)
16. RE: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: "J. D. Johnson" <j_d_johnson@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:48:13 -0700; Where does it say "Rootes ordered engines through the Ford Industrial JD; /html/tigers/2006-08/msg00008.html (6,935 bytes)
17. RE: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: "Robert Palmer" <rpalmerbob@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:35:31 -0700; You might find quite a bit here: http://www.classictiger.com/mudge/pieces/tech1d.htm Where does it say "Rootes ordered engines through the Ford Industrial Division"? JD; /html/tigers/2006-08/msg00009.html (7,208 bytes)
18. RE: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: "J. D. Johnson" <j_d_johnson@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:47:22 -0700; No argument, "handles" is totally different than makes. JD; /html/tigers/2006-08/msg00010.html (6,861 bytes)
19. RE: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:41:56 -0400; The Book of Norman, Page 22 shows an early Tiger engine ID Tag "Ford Industrial Engine". The 260's and 289's used in the Tigers are a non stock configuration so you could not order them directly fro; /html/tigers/2006-08/msg00011.html (7,908 bytes)
20. Re: Wally Swift (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:10:29 EDT; Let's see when compared to a Fairlane 260 I have the Tiger 260 is different. Seems to me that in order to produce these changes Ford would stop all production of the one 260 just to make 3500 Tiger 2; /html/tigers/2006-08/msg00025.html (7,096 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]