Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Was\s+Front\s+suspension\s+rebuild\,\s+now\s+product\s+liability\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Was\s+Front\s+suspension\s+rebuild\,\s+now\s+product\s+liability\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 19:37:18 -0700; The Plaintiff's bar would say that because of all the suits on obviously unsafe products entering the marketplace, the products that we have now are better and safer. The seminal case in torts class; /html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00244.html (9,208 bytes)
2. Re: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:56:20 EDT; Hang in there Steve, you'll be a rich lawyer too someday...probably move to the Jag list. I guess it's time to jump on the insurance guys again. We been lettin' 'em slide for a few months now. Lawyer; /html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00247.html (7,705 bytes)
3. Re: Was Front suspension rebuild, now product liability (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 01:31:18 -0400; Thank you lawyers, thank you Nader, thank you Big Brother. I once was happy in my non-airbag, non-seatbelt, non-ABS, non-padded dash, 56 Ford but now I've seen the light - even contemplating getting; /html/spridgets/2000-10/msg00248.html (9,503 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]