Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wasn\'t\s+the\s+surface\s+good\s+too\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wasn\'t\s+the\s+surface\s+good\s+too\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Wasn't the surface good too! (score: 1): Author: Joseph Weinstein <joe@bea.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:57:45 -0700; *THANKS* for sweeping the course! I ran run-group 2 and it was wonderful, just like driving on a paved surface! No sand-blasting my painted surfaces, and whenever I turned the wheel, by gum, the car; /html/ba-autox/2005-09/msg00077.html (7,175 bytes)
2. Re: Wasn't the surface good too! (score: 1): Author: james creasy <jcreasy@perforce.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:11:44 -0700; by the last group there was a fair bit of smutz on and off the line. much better than the gravel dunes of other events. great course though! james OSP - On Scarified Pavement; /html/ba-autox/2005-09/msg00079.html (7,575 bytes)
3. Re: Wasn't the surface good too! (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:14:20 -0700; The course workers for run group 8 probably guessed that I thought I was attending a drifting exhibition. It was fun but not fast. In fun runs I switched to my "rain" suspension setup and went over a; /html/ba-autox/2005-09/msg00080.html (7,696 bytes)
4. RE: Wasn't the surface good too! (score: 1): Author: "Runnion, Ed" <Ed_Runnion@regionofdoom.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:01:54 -0700; I drove the last run group..... Unfortunately, the nickname of the placed lived up to billing :(. By the end of the day, you drove off the "narrowly defined" line at your own peril. Just like any ot; /html/ba-autox/2005-09/msg00082.html (7,855 bytes)
5. RE: Wasn't the surface good too! (score: 1): Author: Joseph Weinstein <joe@bea.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:17:49 -0700; Gotcha. Ok. Too bad. If that's the way it is, we might be scouring GGF down to the dirt soon in a lot of places...; /html/ba-autox/2005-09/msg00083.html (8,121 bytes)
6. RE: Wasn't the surface good too! (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:55:07 -0400; Message text written by "Runnion, Ed" "As I see it, we spent $500 to sweep the lot and got about 2 run groups worth of clean lot out of it :(. Ed" -- End Original Message -- Ed, I think that's a bett; /html/ba-autox/2005-09/msg00084.html (7,986 bytes)
7. RE: Wasn't the surface good too! (score: 1): Author: "Runnion, Ed" <Ed_Runnion@regionofdoom.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:53:45 -0700; Well, for the first few rungroups it certainly is :). By the time I ran at the end of the day, the surface was not much (if any) better than if we had not swept at all. I would agree this is probabl; /html/ba-autox/2005-09/msg00085.html (8,872 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]