Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+DCOE\s+42\,45\,48\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+DCOE\s+42\,45\,48\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Weber DCOE 42,45,48 (score: 1): Author: "Mordy Dunst" <gasket.works@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 07:34:00 -0600; I can tell you that when I first bought my TR4 it had SU's on them. It was run with SU's for some time prior to putting on 42 DCOE's. I think that if I had not known of the carb switch I would not ha; /html/fot/2001-11/msg00004.html (7,472 bytes)
2. Re: Weber DCOE 42,45,48 (score: 1): Author: "baxter culver" <baxterculver@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:36:09 -0800; I recall being in a "seminar", led by two ex-works Lotus guys, who said the best power they ever achieved with a lotus twin-cam was with Stromberg 175 CD-2's. (That was until the Big Valve came along; /html/fot/2001-11/msg00008.html (9,406 bytes)
3. Re: Weber DCOE 42,45,48 (score: 1): Author: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 19:14:51 -0500; When I changed to Weber DCOE 45's in my TR3 it made a HUGE difference. I was 7 seconds faster at Watkins Glen than with H6 or HS6 carbs. On a shorter track like Lime Rock, they were good for 2 second; /html/fot/2001-11/msg00012.html (8,089 bytes)
4. Fw: Weber DCOE 42,45,48 (score: 1): Author: "Mordy Dunst" <gasket.works@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 21:12:12 -0600; few; /html/fot/2001-11/msg00021.html (6,991 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]