Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+For\s+984\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+For\s+984\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Weber For 984 (score: 1): Author: "Larry Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 15:17:06 -0800; Anyone got any recommendations on a Weber DCOE for a 948? Are they all too much for a 948 or can they be jetted down enough to work. I don't want to go back to SU's and I don't want to chop a hole in; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg00162.html (7,212 bytes)
2. Re: Weber For 984 (score: 1): Author: RBHouston@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 19:11:07 EST; Whatever happened to the company that was supposed to be developing an aftermarket efi to fit lbcs? It was hot news on the Triumph list a while back, and was supposed to be out soon and would make ev; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg00167.html (7,222 bytes)
3. Re: Weber For 984 (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 19:24:37 -0800; Larry A 40 DCOE works great on a 948. A 45 will be too big unless you have a killer 948. I know a guy who runs a stock 948 Bugeye with a 40 on it and it is a nice setup. for jetting check out http://; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg00173.html (7,768 bytes)
4. Re: Weber For 984 (score: 1): Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 17:07:07 -0800 (PST); Their ad is still in Grassroots Motorsports, unchanged, says "available early 98" or something like that. Ulix Ulix __/__,__ ___/__|\__ ..............................................(_o____o_)....<_O; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg00177.html (8,294 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]