Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+Help\s+\/\s+SUs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+Help\s+\/\s+SUs\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: Agustin de la Calle <agustin@risotto.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 11:06:10 -0800 (PST); Hi Mike, Why go for Webers when the SU-HS4 or (H4?) give a nice broad power band, whereas the Webers supposedly have a sharp narrow frequency range. That could make them ineffective. What's your opin; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00018.html (8,184 bytes)
2. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 22:39:43 +1100; Webers don't drift out of tune, are less prone to leaking and produce more HP and they sound a whole lot better :-) Seriously, the mistake most people make with webers is not setting them up properly; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00028.html (9,544 bytes)
3. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>; Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 13:32:03 -0500; most serious engine guys can get more power out of a race engine with SU's than a single weber. Comptune is an example. But it takes a long time, a dyno, several thousands of dollars, and a skilled m; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00042.html (8,044 bytes)
4. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: Randell Jesup <Randell.Jesup@scala.com>; Date: 03 Feb 1998 15:17:16 -0500; Huh? Sounds pretty backwards to me. From everything I've heard, Weber's are a bitch to set up right, but make a bit more HP on highly modified engines. From my experience, SU's are far easier to set; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00049.html (9,616 bytes)
5. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 13:40:18 +1100; Notice Brian said twin SUs vs a single Weber. With split webers you'll make more power again. The reason is almost certainly due to the shape of Weber manifolds The distance b/n the inlet ports on th; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00060.html (10,635 bytes)
6. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 08:27:02 -0500; Carb's are interesting things. To your points - dyno's don't lie. And top engine guys, of which I only know of two or three, can always get more HP out of an ultimate racing engine on HS2's than they; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00063.html (12,243 bytes)
7. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 19:33:45 -0500; I have to speak on this thread. These are my own personal expieriences. Please don't start a flame war after reading them. I've been running SUs for many years then I bolted on a 45 DCOE Weber to a s; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00078.html (8,754 bytes)
8. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: ric_bergstrom@juno.com (Richard L. Bergstrom); Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 19:58:29 -0500; I've never had SU's on the car...(in fact I've never driven a stock 1275cc)...but do have 45 DCOEs. While they are not perfect they are real close! They sound great. They go like stink..once they cle; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00081.html (10,566 bytes)
9. Re: Weber Help / SUs (score: 1): Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 08:39:29 -0500; I agree, and think your experience is pretty normal - a 45 weber is TONs better for potential power than a STOCK pair of SU HS2's, and the Weber has accelerator pumps, which make a big difference in; /html/spridgets/1998-02/msg00092.html (9,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]