Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+Vs\.\s+Skinner\s+Union\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+Vs\.\s+Skinner\s+Union\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Weber Vs. Skinner Union? (score: 1): Author: HFC <froggi@cdsnet.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 22:23:21 -0700; Fellow Spridgeteers: Engine wises (1275), all things being equal, which would you go with and why: a) single 40 DCOE Weber or, b) a pair of 1 1/2 SU's? Solo I/II autocross car, but occasionally FROGG; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00777.html (7,185 bytes)
2. Re: Weber Vs. Skinner Union? (score: 1): Author: Kate & Gary Bales <kgb@clipper.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 10:35:34 -0700; Personally, I would stick with the SUs. Tuned properly, you will get more power, plus they are far easier to work on, and not nearly as fussy. My opinion only. Check out Dave Vizard's book on tuning; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00778.html (7,903 bytes)
3. Re: Weber Vs. Skinner Union? (score: 1): Author: Shawn Knight <eybdoogy@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 09:19:56 -0400; I believe Frank has tried a single SU. Last I remember, he was too frustrated to discuss the results. Shawn; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00783.html (8,158 bytes)
4. Re: Weber Vs. Skinner Union? (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 12:18:57 -0400; I have had ywin SUs, Single 1.75 SU, and Weber down and side drafts on 1275s. it goes. Weber 45 DCOE side draft. Best preformance! Twin 1.25 SUs, Not bad, (stock) Weber down draft, lets just it worke; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg00790.html (9,395 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]