Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+Woes\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Weber Woes (score: 1)
Author: "Henry D. Reynolds" <hdr@jump.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 00:38:29 -0600 (CST)
I suggest that you also read what David Vizard has to say about intake manifolds in "Tuning BL's A-Series Engine". if you are considering running a DCOE. This is a great book even if, like me you hav
/html/mgs/2000-09/msg00073.html (6,232 bytes)

2. Weber Woes (score: 1)
Author: Frank Krajewski <frankk@intap.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:53:24 -0500
I picked up a 1971 MGB recently on which the PO had installed a side draft Weber 42DCOE8, Number 4E. He couldn't get it to run smoothly and neither can I! Seems he, nor I, can find a place to connect
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00504.html (7,564 bytes)

3. RE: Weber Woes (score: 1)
Author: "Lind, Jon" <JLind@ColoradoSkiing.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:32:50 -0700
It is my understanding that with a DCOE carb you cannot use vacuum advance. Check in the carb/manifold section of the Moss catalog as I believe they explain this limitation and the work arounds.
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00505.html (7,456 bytes)

4. RE: Weber Woes (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:24:17 -0800
Matt hit most of the bases. The 42DCOE can be made to work well on your car. A stock MG engine needs to have pretty small chokes as Matt pointed out to keep flow speed high, otherwise the fuel won't
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00512.html (9,850 bytes)

5. Re: Weber Woes (score: 1)
Author: "wizardz" <wizardz@maxinter.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:58:31 -0500
in reference to the 'handedness' of the choke lever assembly... IF ANYONE NEED THE REVERSE TYPE LET ME KNOW! we can probably swap a few so we both end up with what is needed. ... a little more clearl
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00519.html (11,383 bytes)

6. RE: Weber woes (score: 1)
Author: Calvin Krug <ckrug@laf.cioe.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 10:53:11 -0500 (EST)
I have a DCOE on my '79 B, and Jon Lind was correct in his statement that you can't use vacuum advance. The easiest way to solve this problem is to get a mechanical advance distributor, such as the M
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00552.html (8,201 bytes)

7. Re: Weber woes (score: 1)
Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:56:49 -0600
I ran a Weber DGV on a '70 B. It was part of a new conversion kit. I used the vacuum advance unit on the original 25D distributor. It was connected to an outlet on the carb, just like it was connect
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00568.html (7,356 bytes)

8. Re: Weber woes (score: 1)
Author: frank krajewski <frankk@intap.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 12:59:10 -0500
Charley & Peggy: Is is my understanding that the DCOE Weber does not provide for a vacuum advance. The DGV does. There are several list members who speak much more authoritatively on this topic and I
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00584.html (7,869 bytes)

9. Re: Weber woes (score: 1)
Author: frank krajewski <frankk@intap.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 13:35:49 -0500
I have rebuilt numerous dizzys, including removal of weights and springs. Are the correct weights and springs available? If so, I can probably do this myself. Frank "Swamp Yankee" Krajewski http://w
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00585.html (7,916 bytes)

10. Re: Weber woes (score: 1)
Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 18:41:36 -0600
Thanks to everyone who jumped right in the middle of me about my first "Weber Woes" post. FIRST MISTAKE I followed that post up immediately with a cancellation post when I realized Calvin was talking
/html/mgs/2000-03/msg00603.html (7,279 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu