Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+tuning\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+tuning\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: VANDECARR@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:06:24 EDT; My car (73 TR 6) was running pretty good and I decided to "tune" the Webers and installed 28mm chokes that replaced the original 30mm. Now I really messed things up. It runs and idles fine but when I; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00019.html (7,433 bytes)
2. Re: Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 13:12:51 -0600 (MDT); Did you by any chance get one or more of the aux. venturis in upside down when you replaced the chokes? If one cylinder is getting fuel in the idle and progression stages, but not from the main jet,; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00020.html (7,256 bytes)
3. Re: Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: Patrick McMullen <pmcmull@attglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 17:11:59 -0400; Your air corrector jet is waaay to high for your engine. As a rule of thumb, for mild engines, the air corrector is figured by adding 60 to your main jet. Your main is currently 135, your air correc; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00021.html (8,193 bytes)
4. RE: Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 13:08:35 -0700; I'd go smaller on the air corrector, down to about 170 or so, and if it still looks lean, go to 140 mains, then tune from there. You must have DCOE40's, since you can't get a 28 MM for a 45. To me a; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00022.html (8,041 bytes)
5. RE: Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@cruzers.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Sep 00 17:35:35 -0700; How about "How to build & power Tune Weber & Dellorto Carburetors" part of the SpeedPro Series. But they do mention CO readings in a couple of places. I'm reading it now TeriAnn http://www.overlande; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00023.html (7,722 bytes)
6. RE: Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 09:40:16 -0400 (EDT); Just want to point out one minor fact... the Solo II specs for TR6 _requires_ 28 mm chokes. I guess they (the ubiquitous they, of course) don't want us making too much horsepower. I'm pretty sure SC; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00026.html (7,605 bytes)
7. Re: Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: "R. Kastner" <kaskas@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 07:17:35 -0700; Maybe it is time to return to S.U's or Strombergs cause they will flow a hellva lot of air and make more power than you might expect from this old time design. -- Original Message -- From: Bob Lang <; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00027.html (8,280 bytes)
8. Re: Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 12:28:17 -0400 (EDT); Hmmmmm, let's see. More horsepower (potentially - via higher airflow), and the rules let me drop another 100 pounds. With the Webers, the TR6 has to weigh 2000 lbs. With SU's or ZS's, the car only ne; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00029.html (7,685 bytes)
9. Weber tuning (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 09:58:21 -0700; The biggest problem with SUs is the goofy stock manifold. I've often thought of doing a whole bunch of modifications to the stock manifold to make it flow. It just LOOKS wrong. What's the full rundow; /html/fot/2000-09/msg00031.html (7,008 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]