Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+vs\s+Su\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Weber\s+vs\s+Su\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Weber vs Su (score: 1): Author: "R. O. Lindsay" <rolindsay@dgrc.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:28:00 -0500; Hi Gang, This is probably one those topics that has been beaten to death but I must ask. If it is really old hat or offensive, please reply privately. All issues of originality aside, what is the per; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01212.html (7,661 bytes)
2. Re: Weber vs Su (score: 1): Author: "Richard Spurling" <hobbes@senet.com.au>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 01:01:34 +0930; I recently removed the DGV from my '76B and put twin SUs on it. Starting is not easier with the DGV. My car starts very easily with the SUs and was a bit of a dog with the DGV. With the SUs, I felt; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01213.html (7,849 bytes)
3. Re: Weber vs Su (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 01:38:41 +0000; Here we go... OK, I don't have a '70 B-GT but I have driven a 67 'B with Webers and my 68 'B with SUs and for street driving I preferred the SU for 'drivability'. The Webers (which were supposedly tu; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01215.html (7,583 bytes)
4. Re: Weber vs Su (score: 1): Author: "R. O. Lindsay" <rolindsay@dgrc.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:22:54 -0500; Hi Gang, Another quick question. This time, one of originality. On a 1970 MGB-GT that was manufactured in November of 1969, should the engine be black or dark red? Rick Diamond Geoscience Research 57; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01216.html (7,294 bytes)
5. Re: Weber vs Su (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 12:14:42 -0500; Dark red. Anyway, it looks MUCH better than black. -- CR; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01221.html (7,406 bytes)
6. Re: Weber vs Su (score: 1): Author: Matthew Milkevitch <mmilkevitch@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 13:22:52 -0700 (PDT); My experience with the Weber DGV(manual choke): 1)Starting: somewhat better due to the accel pump. However, with the SUs, my car starts on the 4th turnover of the engine, which isn't bad. 2) Road Pe; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01223.html (8,758 bytes)
7. Re: Weber vs Su (score: 1): Author: Bob Shaw <shaws@mlcltd.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:37:27 -0500; Red. -- Bob Shaw Check out Shaw's Garage at http://www.mlcltd.com/shawsgarage/ My British Car is NOT leaky - it's merely marking its territory.; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01242.html (7,662 bytes)
8. Re: Weber vs Su (score: 1): Author: Bob Shaw <shaws@mlcltd.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:36:26 -0500; SUs properly tuned and in good shape are superior carbs, especially in autocrossing. The reason? Which would you rather have in your lap while driving in a spirited manner-gasoline in a 9X13 cake pan; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01243.html (8,499 bytes)
9. Re: Weber vs SU (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:14:30 EDT; First, it's Weber, singular, not Webers, plural, unless you have a crossflow head or a real MG (Twincam). Second, the DGV is not a performance carb. It has it's place in the late cars that have a bra; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01246.html (8,194 bytes)
10. Re: Weber vs SU (score: 1): Author: Editorgary@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:13:52 EDT; << And it's not that I have anything against Webers - I use a pair of them on each of my race cars. >> And having said all that you did about Webers offering only marginal improvement, can you tell u; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01261.html (7,318 bytes)
11. Re: Weber vs SU (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:40:20 EDT; Sure - logical question, I suppose. I race a TVR with an original Mk 4 HRG crossflow head and 40 DCOE Webers, and a Twincam that runs a lot of cam, 12:1 compression, a 7500 rpm redline, and a pair of; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01280.html (7,765 bytes)
12. Weber vs SU (score: 1): Author: "JedPiper" <JedPiper@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 13:07:17 -0500; No, I wouldn't recommend swapping a pair of mechanically sound SU's for a Weber. However, for those out there struggling with a cranky/crappy Zenith, a DGV is a viable alternative to the modificatio; /html/mgs/1997-09/msg01367.html (6,678 bytes)
13. Re: Weber vs SU (score: 1): Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 15:57:10 -0400; Larry, No, I don't qualify! The car I was fooling around with didn't meet the stated comparative requirement - that every thing else be up to snuff. I agree that it would be interesting to hear from; /html/mgs/1997-09/msg01379.html (7,703 bytes)
14. RE: Weber vs SU (score: 1): Author: <larry.g.unger@lmco.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 14:16:27 -0400; Yo! ... Bill Schooler ... you keeping missing your que buddy ... the crowd is asking for ya ... time to make your entrance ... 'stage left'. Safety Fast! ... larry.g.unger@lmco.com '61 MGA 1600 MkII; /html/mgs/1997-09/msg01382.html (6,715 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]