- 1. Weight of MGB synchro/non-synchro transmissions (score: 1)
- Author: James <James@LWSD.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 08:43:26 -0600
- Had an interesting conversation this weekend with someone who;s had some experience racing MGBs. He told me that the early (no first gear synchro) transmission was significantly lighter than the late
- /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00375.html (7,378 bytes)
- 2. Re: Weight of MGB synchro/non-synchro transmissions (score: 1)
- Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 07:53:50 -0800
- As someone who rebuilds these things for a living, I have to tell you your racer friend has his zeroes misplaced. There's maybe a 10lb. difference at best.............. Lawrie British Sportscar Cente
- /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00379.html (8,096 bytes)
- 3. Re: Weight of MGB synchro/non-synchro transmissions (score: 1)
- Author: EricSsmc@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 11:05:12 EST
- I recently shipped three gearboxes, two LH o/d and one D o/d. There is exactly a 14 lb. difference between the early and late boxes. Eric
- /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00381.html (7,080 bytes)
- 4. RE: Weight of MGB synchro/non-synchro transmissions (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Hoy <larryhoy@cwix.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 10:01:49 -0700
- Gotta agree with Lawrie here. I've picked up both and frankly can't tell much difference. I suspect the difference is so small that a scale would be necessary to measure it. Larry Hoy, Denver, CO. US
- /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00383.html (9,106 bytes)
- 5. Re: Weight of MGB synchro/non-synchro transmissions (score: 1)
- Author: James <James@LWSD.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 11:11:17 -0600
- Sigh... Another something-for-nothing dream crashes and burns :-) - James Einolf 1974 MGB (at least now it's raining, so I'm not so sad that the car's not running....)
- /html/mgs/1998-12/msg00384.html (7,284 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu