Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wet\s+VS\s+Dry\s+Sump\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wet\s+VS\s+Dry\s+Sump\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Wet vs Dry Sump (score: 1): Author: "landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 06:59:52 -0500; Another thing to consider is the type of wet sump pump your using. a Ford type (gear rotor I believe) is a more efficient and effective pump than the Chevy style. There can be a cavitation problem wi; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg01197.html (9,362 bytes)
2. Wet VS Dry Sump (score: 1): Author: ardunbill@webtv.net; Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:34:43 -0500 (EST); Looking at the 'old technology', I have to think Henry Ford put a super-good oiling system into the good old Flathead V8, all 20 million of them. I had a chat with John Bradley(for many years King of; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg01198.html (8,112 bytes)
3. Re: Wet VS Dry Sump (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:37:22 -0500; It revs about as fast as my lawn mower looks a lot like it times 8.. So exactly what does this have to do with a modern racing engine.. It is whole different world out there.. I suspect most high sch; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg01209.html (7,762 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]