Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\'s\s+wrong\s+with\s+class\s+proliferation\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\'s\s+wrong\s+with\s+class\s+proliferation\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: Ben Thatcher <bthatch@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:09:46 -0400; I've seen posts for years about us having "too many classes" in Solo II. Why are people concerned? I dunno, maybe their own pet class is suffering from a mass exodus to another class or something. I; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01381.html (9,657 bytes)
2. What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:02:26 -0500; This is all fine & dandy if the 'deleting' process works. But it doesn't. When is the last time we deleted a class? (Yes, I know that F/P went away temporarily - but came back to make the world safe; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01385.html (10,546 bytes)
3. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:09:27 -0500; Uhh, Ben, you should actually examine the class demographics before making statements like the above. The "other category" classes (SM, F125, and ST) contributed a total of 68 entries, many of whom w; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01386.html (9,085 bytes)
4. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 19:16:26 -0500; FWIW, more than half of SM were at their first Nationals. So you are saying the object was to hit 1000, as opposed to making the event available to as many as possible? And that having hit 1000, any; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01416.html (9,108 bytes)
5. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 19:41:06 -0500; I don't think that these are the reasons for wanting to control class proliferation. I personal feel that too many classes dilute the existing ones more than adding new people. Let this go unchecked,; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01424.html (9,613 bytes)
6. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 20:15:33 -0500; making the event No, it was quite clear what I was saying: that the new classes aren't responsible for the growth of Solo II. I also pointed out that I don't necessarily think the new classes are a b; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01427.html (8,205 bytes)
7. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 21:23:49 EDT; You are absolutely right again, and again, and again, and again (and again and at least again) about this 'problem'. Not only does it dilute the quality of the competition, it has diluted the qualit; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01429.html (8,579 bytes)
8. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: Ben Thatcher <bthatch@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 19:52:42 -0400; Jay, do you think that this year's "other category" classes are the only "new" classes to be added in recent years. Just in the last 5 years we've seen FM, FSP and renewal of FP from a failed attempt; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01456.html (9,811 bytes)
9. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:39:22 -0500; the only years we've "consolidate" If you're now saying that added SP classes can attract the "new and different types of cars that enthusiasts are embracing," you are contradicting a number of your; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01460.html (9,480 bytes)
10. RE: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: "Ellingson, George A (MED)" <George.Ellingson@amermsx.med.ge.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:02:06 -0500; Lets not forget another reason Nationals attendance was up substantially: It's the economy, Stupid! (not directed at anyone). People have extra money and things are humming along. As a first time Nat; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01463.html (8,942 bytes)
11. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 15:42:43 -0400; I don't see it. The "new" classes -- STS, the "new" CSP, DSP SM and F125 had fields which compared pretty favorably with other classes in those categories (these are the open class totals): AM (18) B; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01496.html (10,198 bytes)
12. Re: What's wrong with class proliferation? (score: 1): Author: Bob Monday <boysrus_racing@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:08:26 -0700 (PDT); Let's combine Ben's idea with Pat's idea: Trophies only 3 deep, and more classes. Wouldn't that be better than getting an 11th place National trophy? I have one of the latter, and would have preferre; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01606.html (8,445 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]