Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+Model\?\?\s+Suspension\s+Question\s+Again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+Model\?\?\s+Suspension\s+Question\s+Again\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: What Model?? Suspension Question Again (score: 1): Author: Eric Zambori <eaz@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 15:06:43 -0800; Yes, that was an oversight on my part. It's a 72 B roadster. But Lawrie Alexander recognized that the kingpin design for most MGs built between 1947 and 1980 was similar enough to go ahead and identi; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01267.html (8,235 bytes)
2. Re: What Model?? Suspension Question Again (score: 1): Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:14:37 -0800; Yes, the large washers should bottom out. They are designed this way to prevent the nut from being overtightened and to allow the bushing (of whatever type) room to work properly. Lawrie British Spor; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01289.html (9,122 bytes)
3. Re: What Model?? Suspension Question Again (score: 1): Author: Eric Zambori <eaz@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 07:28:43 -0800; Thanks to Barney and Lawrie for their replies. It does actually make sense that this is how it's designed. But after seeing and hearing about so many screwed up things by previous owners and their me; /html/mgs/1999-03/msg01304.html (8,901 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]