Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+the\s+heck\s+is\s+1967\s+spec\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+the\s+heck\s+is\s+1967\s+spec\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. What the heck is 1967 spec? (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:33:05 -0400; Some of you guru's help me here please... I'm pulling the engine out of my 73 B roadster this weekend to begin a complete rebuild, with a "When in doubt, replace it" mentality. Based on what I've rea; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01263.html (9,131 bytes)
2. RE: What the heck is 1967 spec? (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 14:09:45 -0700; 1967 Specs. 372-248 HS4 carb. set Or rebuilt HS4 Carbs. Simpler than HIF and are easier to set idle. Also have the correct port to operate. 143-110 Replacement 62-71 Distributor. This unit is new, an; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01265.html (11,509 bytes)
3. Re: What the heck is 1967 spec? (score: 1): Author: Phil Bates <jello@ida.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:13:32 -0600; I have a '67 - here is what is important. Dual SU's (I think the note below is right - HS4's) and no emissions equip. No gulp valve, no air pump, no power anything, just a simple high compression eng; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01272.html (12,861 bytes)
4. Re: What the heck is 1967 spec? (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:50:22 -0700 (PDT); Phil - I believe that the oil coolers were standard from the beginning until the rubber-bumper cars came in the 74.5.... == Dan DiBiase Dayton, NJ 76 MGB Tourer Driver - Brooklands Green 66 Pull-hand; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01281.html (7,402 bytes)
5. Re: What the heck is 1967 spec? (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:05:53 EDT; << REASON: Dual DCOE's lose power a the bottom end, and only gain at high rpm's I dont think are going to occur that often in a daily driver. DGV's dont seem to be hugely liked here, and almost 100%; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01285.html (7,983 bytes)
6. Re: What the heck is 1967 spec? (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:33:00 -0400; Oddly enough, I've been getting email dropped to the list, I'll try again. Kelvin, Fantastic, thank you. Exactly the type of info I was looking for. A few questions, interspersed below... Excellent,; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01293.html (11,420 bytes)
7. Re: What the heck is 1967 spec? (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:30:34 -0400; Fantastic, thank you. Exactly the type of info I was looking for. A few questions, interspersed below... Excellent, for some reason I had thought the opposite. As the car currently has a single DGV; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01294.html (11,383 bytes)
8. Re: What the heck is 1967 spec? (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:19:43 -0500; What are the throar sizes in the DGV for the 1500? TIA, CR; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg01300.html (7,064 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]