Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wheels\s+go\s+round\s+and\s+round\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wheels\s+go\s+round\s+and\s+round\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Fwd: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: Alan Morrison <morrison.aj@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:14:06 +0100; Surely what matters is the circumference of a tire(tyre to us poms) If the tire's a bit squashed at the bottom it will affect the radius at that point but the circumference is not changed. If an unlo; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00032.html (7,836 bytes)
2. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:50:36 +0100; The *effective* circumference is governed by the radius at the point of contact with the road. The *actual* circumference is immaterial. PaulH. -- Original Message --; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00042.html (7,795 bytes)
3. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: Bob Howard <mgbob@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:18:04 -0400; How can effective circ differ from actual? I can see that diameter can be effective or actual because of squish, but do not understand how circumference is affected. x inches of road progress is mad; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00043.html (8,166 bytes)
4. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: RampantNM@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:54:55 EDT; The *effective* circumference is governed by the radius at the point of contact with the road. The *actual* circumference is immaterial. PaulH. Ohhh, my brain hurts. Can you 'splain this in simple Am; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00044.html (8,692 bytes)
5. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: "Paul T. Root" <ptroot@iaces.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 09:10:19 -0500; A tire with less air is going to be flatter, so more of the tread will be touching the ground at the same time, and the sidewalls will be flatting out, thus cutting some of the circumference. This go; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00045.html (9,477 bytes)
6. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:28:36 +0100; Being a simple (and elderly, since I got my first pensioner haircut this week (a few years before I'm entitled I might add)) soul I'll struggle, but the flatter a tyre is the more it squirms against; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00046.html (8,949 bytes)
7. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: "Larry Daniels" <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:03:41 -0500; As an extreme example think of a tracked vehicle - the rolling circumference is governed by the radius of the wheels plus the thickness of the track, not the circumference of the track. PaulH. ** Ver; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00048.html (8,349 bytes)
8. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: RampantNM@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:08:43 EDT; As an extreme example think of a tracked vehicle - the rolling circumference is governed by the radius of the wheels plus the thickness of the track, not the circumference of the track. OK...I got it; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00049.html (8,630 bytes)
9. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:41:21 +0100; Ulp! Now I would say that regardless of the circumference of the wheels a mile of track would still go round for each mile travelled (ignoring slippage). What *would* be different is the distance tra; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00051.html (8,140 bytes)
10. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:53:04 +0100; But that is my point, the squish in a tyre, and particularly a flat one, results in squirm of the tread on the road, or the wheel turning relative to the tyre, that means that the distance a car trav; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00052.html (8,507 bytes)
11. RE: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: "Gosling, Richard B" <Richard.Gosling@atkinsglobal.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:56:25 +0100; I've just looked at what I've written below, and decided that this message should be prefaced by a WARNING - VERY LONG RAMBLING MESSAGE FROM MILDY BOOZED-UP ENGINEER. Still with me? Don't say I didn'; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00078.html (11,846 bytes)
12. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:45:49 +0100; They do. And cross-plies squirm much more than radials which is why the latter give much better grip and wear, but they still squirm to some degree. The biggest discrepancy is that my tyre measured 1; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00081.html (8,164 bytes)
13. Re: Wheels go round and round (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@MGAguru.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 05:43:46 -0500; I believe I have a clearer answer to this "apparent" discrepancy. The inner plies of the tire, especially for a belted tire, will not stretch or compress much under any circumstances. This means the; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00082.html (9,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]