Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Which\s+engine\s+to\s+rebuild\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Which\s+engine\s+to\s+rebuild\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Which engine to rebuild (score: 1): Author: michael lunsford <mblunsfordsr@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 04:44:48 -0700 (PDT); Ok, I admit it, I've become wishy washy. I can't decide which of the two engines I have to rebuild to replace the ailing one in 1970 TR 6. Given that matching numbers aren't that important to me I am; /html/6pack/2005-08/msg00103.html (7,351 bytes)
2. Re: Which engine to rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Terry Geiger" <tgeiger@shoalsbritishcars.org>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:46:20 -0500; The later block has two advantages: 1) recesses around the top of the cylinder bore improves head gasket sealing (less likely to blow a head gasket) 2) there is a reinforcement cast into the side of; /html/6pack/2005-08/msg00104.html (8,098 bytes)
3. RE: Which engine to rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 07:52:51 -0700; I would add that the later head is of a superior design, as is the intake manifold that fits the later head. If the later head is milled to raise the compression, the head and manifold will deliver; /html/6pack/2005-08/msg00105.html (9,004 bytes)
4. Re: Which engine to rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:22:31 -0400 (EDT); Given that you have two engines, you could merge the parts from both to get the best case. I'd use the early motor bottom end and block because the rods are stronger due to them NOT being "drilled"; /html/6pack/2005-08/msg00107.html (9,476 bytes)
5. RE: Which engine to rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:08:35 -0700; I agree with all your comments. I would add this remark: While the late model cam is wimpy, it is stouter than the early TR6 cam. The early cam was 240 degrees, the later cam is 256 degrees (The GT6; /html/6pack/2005-08/msg00111.html (9,247 bytes)
6. RE: Which engine to rebuild (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:06:28 -0400 (EDT); Yes, I agree with all the cam stuff and C/R points. What I should have added to my post was that if you jettison the stock fed. spec. cam (either the 10-50/50-10 or the 18-58/58-18) and put in the 2; /html/6pack/2005-08/msg00114.html (7,726 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]